-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rewrote base level self condition check #3890
base: condition-baseLvl
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
On one hand i don't like this change because we break backward compatibility. EventMacro:
we need to decide what name to use next |
we also use "maxBase" here Why do we use "maxBase" and "minBase" in the "processAutoBuy" function? This function uses the "checkSelfCondition" check, which is included by "maxBase" and "minBase". Need to re-review #2719 |
Renamed "joblvl" to "jobLvl" for the autoConfChange block We need:
|
We are not ready for the merger yet. What are we going to do about this?
|
Why not leave them both in Misc.pm and only change config.txt? That way backwards compatibility isn't broken and new code can be written with the new sintax |
I think we haven't used backward compatibility for a long time now to make the code cleaner |
actually the wx inteface display the wrong exp block after Lv 230~,or maybe lv 240.. |
screenshot please |
I mean the latest packets are using a int64 exp that we are not currently supporting so that could be possible |
i mean base LV,not job |
This issue does not apply to pull requests. |
I will update wiki once this is merged.