Updated embrace use case #1016
Updated embrace use case #1016
Conversation
|
|
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
Closing this pull request after a prolonged period of inactivity. If this is still relevant, please feel free to create a new pull request with up-to-date information. |
|
Sorry, this was closed by accident. |
|
@robha67 Sorry that it took so long, but now the example is adapted to the test suite setup and should hopefully pass all checks. |
|
@robha67 I had to reduce the stopTime from 1200 to 12 in order to make the test pass in reasonable time. Please let me know if you see any problem with that. |
|
I could imagine that the longer time step could cause some instability problems and erranous results. Is the OM simulator checked for numerical stability? If not, then I don't see a problem. @lochel |
|
I didn't change the step size. The simulation just terminates at stopTime=12 instead of stopTime=1200 because the test case otherwise takes way too much time. |
|
Oh, ok. Then I missunderstood you. I see no reason to run the entire mission. I guess a longer simulation is needed to se the effect concerning the potential issue of increasing overhead but I believe that investigation is best done "off-line" |
Related Issues
Updated use-case with a simulink generated SW FMU. The use-case now include "bus-to-bus" type connections including a int to enum connection.
Purpose
Open test platform capturing end-user requirements on OMSimulator