-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert redeem integration test #747
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few comments, mostly refactoring and typographical. On refactoring, there is a fair amount of repetition (e.g., type definitions like RedeemRequest
, functions like proveGateway
, etc.)—can this be refactored?
Additionally, I suggest changing "unStake" and "UnStake" to "unstake" and "Unstake", respectively, globally.
Finally, when I lint, errors are raised, even in the files that are entirely new—please review and address.
test_integration/03_redeem_and_unstake/utils/revert_redeem_assertion.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test_integration/03_redeem_and_unstake/utils/revert_redeem_assertion.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test_integration/03_redeem_and_unstake/utils/progress_revert_redeem_assertion.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good.
Some minor but important changes.
test_integration/03_redeem_and_unstake/utils/revert_redeem_assertion.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
test_integration/03_redeem_and_unstake/utils/revert_redeem_assertion.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 🚀 ✅
Fixes #610
Revert redeem integration test.