fix(api): use critical point instead of primary nozzle when doing deck conflict check

[sanni-t]

Closes RQA-3175

Overview

There was a bug in the deck conflict checker that it wasn't considering the change in critical point of pipette in use when addressing reservoirs. This was leading to incorrect conflict checks when moving to any labware that had the centerMultichannelOnWells quirk.

This PR fixes that by correctly finding the pipette's boundaries when its critical point is moved to the destination in question rather than its primary nozzle (the default critical point).

Test Plan and Hands on Testing

• Added integration tests that uses reservoirs with row and channel configurations
• Existing unit and integration tests should remain unaffected
• Add tests for conflict checks with 8-channel pipette partial column configuration
• Test on a robot that existing pipette movements with different pipettes in different configurations is not affected

Review requests

• Make sure the logic checks out & test on robot

Risk assessment

Low. We have quite good test coverage for a lot of cases so any unexpected changes should get caught in the tests easily.

[CaseyBatten]

This looks really solid so far, thanks for the fast turnaround Sanniti! Passes analysis for Sara's protocol from the related ticket well and without issues.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (chore_release-8.0.0@81770b3). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##             chore_release-8.0.0   #16268   +/-   ##
======================================================
  Coverage                       ?   63.28%           
======================================================
  Files                          ?      300           
  Lines                          ?    15786           
  Branches                       ?        0           
======================================================
  Hits                           ?     9990           
  Misses                         ?     5796           
  Partials                       ?        0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
g-code-testing	92.43% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.