Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ROCM] Add ROCm support for warpctc op (#31817) #31971

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2021

Conversation

windstamp
Copy link
Contributor

@windstamp windstamp commented Mar 31, 2021

PR types

New features

PR changes

OPs

Describe

warpctc 支持 ROCm。

* bugfix for warpctc

* fix warpctc commit id

* fix warpctc commit id

* fix warpctc commit id

* fix warpctc commit id

* fix warpctc commit id

* fix WARPCTC_WITH_HIP invalid

* Add logs to find out why can not dlopen libwarpctc.so

* fix warpctc commit id

* fix unit test test_warpctc_op

* Optime failed log for dlopen

* Optime failed log for dlopen

* Delete extra changes

* fix warpctc commit id

* fix warpctc commit id

* Add is_compiled_with_rocm for test_warpctc_op

* fix warpctc commit id

* Cancel optimize dlopen failed reason, move to next pr, due to it makes windows ci failed

* Cancel optimize dlopen failed reason, move to next pr, due to it makes windows ci failed

* Cancel optimize dlopen failed reason, move to next pr, due to it makes windows ci failed

* fix code style problems
@paddle-bot-old
Copy link

Thanks for your contribution!
Please wait for the result of CI firstly. See Paddle CI Manual for details.

@paddle-bot-old
Copy link

paddle-bot-old bot commented Mar 31, 2021

✅ This PR's description meets the template requirements!
Please wait for other CI results.

@qili93 qili93 merged commit 3560e68 into PaddlePaddle:2.0.1-rocm-post Mar 31, 2021
@windstamp windstamp deleted the 2.0.1-rocm-post branch February 11, 2022 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants