Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add a inner loop for index_select_grad_init() in index_select op when dealing with large-shape data #41563

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 12, 2022

Conversation

FlyingQianMM
Copy link
Contributor

PR types

Bug fixes

PR changes

OPs

Describe

For index_select op, the function index_select_grad_init will not work on part of data whose number exceeds the loop number, so we add a inner loop by replacing for() with CUDA_KERNEL_LOOP.

@paddle-bot-old
Copy link

paddle-bot-old bot commented Apr 8, 2022

你的PR提交成功,感谢你对开源项目的贡献!
请关注后续CI自动化测试结果,详情请参考Paddle-CI手册
Your PR has been submitted. Thanks for your contribution!
Please wait for the result of CI firstly. See [Paddle CI Manual(https://www.paddlepaddle.org.cn/documentation/docs/zh/develop/dev_guides/git_guides/paddle_ci_manual_cn.html) for details.

@FlyingQianMM FlyingQianMM changed the title replace for with CUDA_KERNEL_LOOP for index_select_grad_init() in index_select op add a inner loop for index_select_grad_init() in index_select op when dealing with large-shape data Apr 8, 2022
ZzSean
ZzSean previously approved these changes Apr 8, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@ZzSean ZzSean left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@FlyingQianMM FlyingQianMM merged commit bc01242 into PaddlePaddle:develop Apr 12, 2022
FlyingQianMM added a commit to FlyingQianMM/Paddle that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2022
XiaoguangHu01 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants