Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Excerpt Suggestions integration tests #2671

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 26, 2024

Conversation

acicovic
Copy link
Collaborator

@acicovic acicovic commented Jul 26, 2024

Description

This PR adds integration tests for the Excerpt Suggestions feature. It runs all the tests defined in the ContentHelperFeatureTest class, plus a test to confirm that PCH User Role permission settings work.

Motivation and context

Add more tests.

How has this been tested?

Tests logic has been validated, and tests pass.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced integration tests for the PCH Excerpt Suggestions feature to validate asset enqueueing based on user roles.
    • Added a test to ensure assets are not enqueued by default for non-admin users, improving functionality checks.

@acicovic acicovic added this to the Summer 2024 milestone Jul 26, 2024
@acicovic acicovic self-assigned this Jul 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new integration test class, ContentHelperExcerptSuggestionsTest, designed to validate the functionality of the PCH Excerpt Suggestions feature. The tests focus on ensuring that assets are correctly enqueued based on user roles and filter values. Notably, it includes assertions to confirm that non-admin users do not have assets enqueued by default, enhancing the robustness of the content helper testing framework.

Changes

Files Change Summary
tests/Integration/content-helper/ContentHelperExcerptSuggestionsTest.php Introduced a new test class for PCH Excerpt Suggestions focusing on asset enqueueing logic and user role restrictions. Includes a method to assert asset enqueueing status based on various parameters.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Test
    participant ContentHelper

    User->>Test: Initiates test for asset enqueueing
    Test->>ContentHelper: Checks user role and filter values
    ContentHelper-->>Test: Returns enqueue status
    Test->>User: Asserts expected enqueue status
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@acicovic acicovic changed the title Refactor some integration tests @acicovic Add Excerpt Suggestions integration tests Jul 26, 2024
@acicovic acicovic changed the title @acicovic Add Excerpt Suggestions integration tests Add Excerpt Suggestions integration tests Jul 26, 2024
@acicovic acicovic marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2024 09:29
@acicovic acicovic requested a review from a team as a code owner July 26, 2024 09:29
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
tests/Integration/content-helper/ContentHelperExcerptSuggestionsTest.php (3)

1-6: Ensure the file header adheres to WordPress coding standards.

The file header comment should follow the WordPress PHP coding standards.

- /**
-  * Integration Tests: PCH Excerpt Suggestions
-  *
-  * @package Parsely\Tests
-  */
+ /**
+  * Integration Tests: PCH Excerpt Suggestions.
+  *
+  * @package Parsely\Tests
+  */

19-31: Ensure the method docstring adheres to WordPress coding standards.

The method docstring should follow the WordPress PHP coding standards.

-  * @param mixed                $global_filter_value The value of the global filter.
-  * @param mixed                $feature_filter_value The value of the feature filter.
-  * @param bool                 $expected Whether the assets should be enqueued.
-  * @param string               $user_login The current user's login.
-  * @param string               $user_role The current user's role.
-  * @param array<string, mixed> $additional_args Any required additional arguments.
+  * @param mixed  $global_filter_value   The value of the global filter.
+  * @param mixed  $feature_filter_value  The value of the feature filter.
+  * @param bool   $expected              Whether the assets should be enqueued.
+  * @param string $user_login            The current user's login.
+  * @param string $user_role             The current user's role.
+  * @param array  $additional_args       Any required additional arguments.

50-74: Ensure the method docstring adheres to WordPress coding standards.

The method docstring should follow the WordPress PHP coding standards.

-  * @covers \Parsely\Content_Helper\Content_Helper_Feature::can_enable_feature
-  * @covers \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::run
-  * @covers \Parsely\Permissions::current_user_can_use_pch_feature
-  * @covers \Parsely\Permissions::get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_cap
-  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Content_Helper_Feature::get_global_filter_name
-  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::__construct
-  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::can_enable_feature
-  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::get_feature_filter_name
-  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::get_script_id
-  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::get_style_id
-  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::__construct
-  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::allow_parsely_remote_requests
-  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::are_credentials_managed
-  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::get_managed_credentials
-  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::get_options
-  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::set_default_full_metadata_in_non_posts
-  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::set_default_track_as_values
-  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::set_managed_options
+  * @covers \Parsely\Content_Helper\Content_Helper_Feature::can_enable_feature.
+  * @covers \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::run.
+  * @covers \Parsely\Permissions::current_user_can_use_pch_feature.
+  * @covers \Parsely\Permissions::get_user_roles_with_edit_posts_cap.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Content_Helper_Feature::get_global_filter_name.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::__construct.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::can_enable_feature.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::get_feature_filter_name.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::get_script_id.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Content_Helper\Excerpt_Generator::get_style_id.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::__construct.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::allow_parsely_remote_requests.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::are_credentials_managed.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::get_managed_credentials.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::get_options.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::set_default_full_metadata_in_non_posts.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::set_default_track_as_values.
+  * @uses \Parsely\Parsely::set_managed_options.
Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e2a654 and 4b02bf8.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/Integration/content-helper/ContentHelperExcerptSuggestionsTest.php (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
tests/Integration/content-helper/ContentHelperExcerptSuggestionsTest.php (1)

Pattern **/*.{html,php}: "Perform a detailed review of the provided code with following key aspects in mind:

  • Review the HTML and PHP code to ensure it is well-structured and adheres to best practices.
  • Ensure the code follows WordPress coding standards and is well-documented.
  • Confirm the code is secure and free from vulnerabilities.
  • Optimize the code for performance, removing any unnecessary elements.
  • Validate comments for accuracy, currency, and adherence to WordPress coding standards.
  • Ensure each line comment concludes with a period.
  • Verify code compatibility with the latest version of WordPress, avoiding deprecated functions or features."
Additional comments not posted (4)
tests/Integration/content-helper/ContentHelperExcerptSuggestionsTest.php (4)

8-8: Ensure strict types declaration is necessary.

The declare(strict_types=1); directive enforces strict type checking. Confirm that this is necessary for the integration tests.


10-14: Optimize imports.

Ensure that only necessary classes are imported. Verify if all imported classes are used within the file.


32-48: LGTM! Ensure parent method functionality.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that the parent method assert_enqueued_status_default is correctly implemented and utilized.

Verification successful

Parent method assert_enqueued_status_default is correctly implemented and utilized.

The method performs the necessary actions to set the user, apply filters, deregister assets, and assert the expected script and style status, ensuring the functionality required by the derived method.

  • tests/Integration/ContentHelperFeatureTest.php
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of the parent method `assert_enqueued_status_default`.

# Test: Search for the parent method implementation. Expect: Correct implementation and usage.
rg --type php -A 5 $'function assert_enqueued_status_default'

Length of output: 520


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Retrieve the full implementation of the parent method `assert_enqueued_status_default`.

# Extract the full implementation of the method.
rg --type php -A 20 'function assert_enqueued_status_default' tests/Integration/ContentHelperFeatureTest.php

Length of output: 701


75-83: LGTM! Ensure comprehensive test coverage.

The code changes are approved.

However, ensure that the test covers all necessary scenarios and that the assertions are valid.

Copy link
Contributor

@vaurdan vaurdan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

Base automatically changed from update/refactor-some-integration-tests to develop July 26, 2024 14:39
@acicovic acicovic merged commit 3cf5836 into develop Jul 26, 2024
36 checks passed
@acicovic acicovic deleted the add/excerpt-suggestions-integration-tests branch July 26, 2024 14:46
@acicovic acicovic modified the milestones: Summer 2024, 3.17.0 Sep 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants