API Key: Add utility method for checking it is set #404
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also add utility method for checking if it is missing. Includes unit tests. Closes #395.
Adds unit test.
pauarge
reviewed
Sep 27, 2021
pauarge
reviewed
Sep 27, 2021
pauarge
reviewed
Sep 27, 2021
That can be a subsequent PR. |
pauarge
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Add utility method for checking the API key is saved in the
parselyoptions, and a second utility method for checking if it is missing.Adds a third utility method for retrieving the API key.
Includes unit tests.
In the future, these methods may be moved to a Parsely_Options or similar class.
Motivation and Context
These methods can be used by various other classes and methods to see if this key trigger of behaviour changes is available, and provides the key as needed.
Closes #395.
How Has This Been Tested?
Integration tests pass, and work on #406 which utilises the new methods.
Screenshots (if appropriate):