Remove CompletedOutgoingTxs from unsigned batch and contract calls lookups #556
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update focuses on refining the process of handling outgoing transactions in a blockchain environment. By iterating directly over transactions by type and emphasizing the acquisition of Ethereum signatures, both unsigned batch transactions and contract call transactions are now processed more efficiently. This streamlined approach enhances the system's capability to manage transactions destined for the Ethereum network. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- module/x/gravity/keeper/batch.go (1 hunks)
- module/x/gravity/keeper/contract_call.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
module/x/gravity/keeper/contract_call.go (2)
- 12-17: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [11-35]
The implementation of
GetUnsignedContractCallTxscorrectly iterates over outgoing transactions by type and checks for Ethereum signatures. This aligns with the PR objectives to streamline the process of handling unsigned contract call transactions.
- 12-17: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [37-61]
In
contractCallExecuted, the logic for cleaning up after a contract call transaction has been executed is sound. It ensures that all contract call transactions with a nonce lower than the executed transaction's nonce are deleted, which is consistent with the goal of optimizing transaction processing.module/x/gravity/keeper/batch.go (2)
- 163-168: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-118]
No specific changes to review in
CreateBatchTx,batchTxExecuted, and related functions as they do not directly pertain to the retrieval of unsigned batch transactions. However, it's important to ensure that these functions continue to work as expected with any changes made to the handling of unsigned batch transactions.
- 163-168: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [120-148]
The
GetUnsignedBatchTxsfunction has been modified to directly iterate over outgoing transactions by type and check for Ethereum signatures, which aligns with the PR objectives to optimize the retrieval of unsigned batch transactions. This change should improve the efficiency of the process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- module/x/gravity/keeper/batch_test.go (2 hunks)
- module/x/gravity/keeper/contract_call_test.go (1 hunks)
- module/x/gravity/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (2 hunks)
- orchestrator/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 7
orchestrator/Dockerfile (1)
- 3-3: LGTM!
module/x/gravity/keeper/contract_call_test.go (1)
- 99-100: LGTM!
module/x/gravity/keeper/grpc_query_test.go (2)
- 303-305: LGTM!
- 349-351: LGTM!
module/x/gravity/keeper/batch_test.go (3)
- 395-396: LGTM!
- 441-442: LGTM!
- 447-448: LGTM!
|
The failures in CI here are unrelated. Confirm integration test passes running locally, this is an issue with Github. Should be safe to merge. |
Summary by CodeRabbit