Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update release-6.5.Dockerfile #196

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor

@wuhuizuo wuhuizuo commented Jan 9, 2024

No description provided.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot requested review from jayl1e and purelind January 9, 2024 06:45
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.
Based on the provided information, the pull request seems to only add some comments to the Dockerfile and update the base image from pingcap/centos-stream:8 to PingCAP-QE/ci-dockerfile/blob/master/jenkins/amd64/alpine-3.14.6. No actual code changes are made.

However, there are some potential issues:

  • The added comments do not provide much value and may clutter the codebase.
  • The change of the base image may introduce compatibility issues or other unknown problems.

Suggestions:

  • Remove the added comments as they do not add any value to the codebase.
  • Before changing the base image, the contributor should provide a clear reason for doing so and verify that the new image does not introduce any compatibility issues or other problems.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Jan 9, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2024

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.
Based on the title and the diff, it seems that the only change in this pull request is the addition of some comments to the Dockerfile and removing a trailing whitespace. Therefore, there are no potential problems that could be introduced by this change.

As for fixing suggestions, it would be good to make sure that the comments added are informative and useful to other developers who may be working on this codebase in the future. Additionally, if the author of this pull request plans to compose a multi-arch image, it would be helpful to provide more specific details on how this will be done and what the benefits of doing so are.

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Contributor Author

wuhuizuo commented Jan 9, 2024

/approve

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jan 9, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 7d8931d into main Jan 9, 2024
7 checks passed
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot deleted the fix/update-old-tidb-base-image-dockerfile branch January 9, 2024 07:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant