feat(dockerfiles/cd/builders): add builder image for tidb-operator

[wuhuizuo]

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo wuhuizuo@126.com

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

This pull request adds a new builder image for tidb-operator in the dockerfiles/cd/builders directory. The changes include adding a new image to the existing skaffold.yaml file and creating a new Dockerfile for the tidb-operator.

The potential problem is that the PR does not provide any information about the testing process and the results of the testing. Therefore, it is suggested to add a section about the testing process and the results of the testing as part of the PR description.

Additionally, the PR could benefit from a detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the changes, such as why a new builder image was needed and how it will improve the overall CI/CD process.

The fixing suggestions are as follows:

1. Add a section about the testing process and the results of the testing as part of the PR description.
2. Provide a detailed explanation of the reasoning behind the changes, such as why a new builder image was needed and how it will improve the overall CI/CD process.

[wuhuizuo]

/approve

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title and description, the key change is adding a new builder image for tidb-operator. The changes include adding a new Dockerfile for tidb-operator, updating the skaffold.yaml file to include the new image, and updating the profiles section in the file.

One potential problem is that there is no explanation of why this change is necessary. Is there a specific need for a new builder image for tidb-operator? Without this information, it is difficult to assess the necessity of the change.

Another potential problem is that the profiles section in skaffold.yaml has been updated without any explanation of why the changes were made. This could lead to confusion for other developers who may need to work with this file in the future.

To address these issues, the pull request could be updated to include a brief explanation of why the new builder image is necessary. Additionally, the changes to the profiles section in skaffold.yaml could be explained in more detail to provide context for other developers.

Overall, the changes look straightforward and the code appears to be well-organized and easy to read.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Summary:
The pull request adds a new builder image for tidb-operator to the existing dockerfiles/cd/builders/skaffold.yaml file, and a new Dockerfile for tidb-operator in the dockerfiles/cd/builders/tidb-operator directory.

Potential problems:

• The pull request does not contain any test cases, so it may introduce issues that were not caught during development.
• The Dockerfile for tidb-operator may have vulnerabilities or outdated packages that could impact security.

Fixing suggestions:

• Add test cases to ensure that the changes do not break existing functionality.
• Consider using a package scanner to identify and remediate vulnerabilities in the docker image.
• Consider updating the packages to the latest versions, especially the base image used in the Dockerfile for tidb-operator, to ensure that the container is secure.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

This pull request adds a new builder image for tidb-operator. The changes include a new Dockerfile for tidb-operator and updates to the skaffold.yaml file to include the new image.

There are no potential problems identified in this pull request, as it only adds a new image and does not make any changes to existing code.

Some suggestions for improvement include:

• Adding more information to the pull request description to explain why the new tidb-operator image is necessary and what problem it solves.
• Ensuring that the new image is properly tested before merging the pull request.

[wuhuizuo]

/approve

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [wuhuizuo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment