-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(apps/prod/tekton/configs/tasks): fix task multi-arch-image-collect for hotfix stories #1348
Conversation
…t for hotfix stories Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo <wuhuizuo@126.com>
Based on the pull request title and description, it seems that the PR is fixing a task called "multi-arch-image-collect" for hotfix stories. The diff shows that the PR adds two new image tags and changes the way tags are parsed and trimmed. One potential problem is that the changes made to the "multi-arch-image-collect" task may have unintended consequences. It's important to thoroughly test the changes before merging the PR to ensure that the task is working as expected. As for fixing suggestions, it would be a good idea to create a separate branch to test the changes before merging them into the main branch. Additionally, it may be helpful to add more documentation to the PR description to explain the reasoning behind the changes and how they were tested. This will make it easier for reviewers and future contributors to understand the changes and their impact. |
Based on the pull request title and description, it seems that the changes are meant to fix a task related to multi-arch image collection for hotfix stories. The changes include updating the image version, fixing the However, there are some potential issues that I noticed in the pull request:
To fix these issues, I suggest the following changes:
|
Based on the PR title and description, this pull request is intended to fix the There are a few potential problems with this pull request. First, there is no detailed explanation for the addition of the two new images, which could cause confusion for future maintainers. Second, the script modification for handling semver tags might be unnecessary since the current implementation might already handle them correctly. Finally, there are no tests included with this pull request which makes it difficult to verify that the changes work as intended. To address these issues, I suggest adding a brief explanation for the addition of the two new images in the PR description or the commit message. Additionally, it might be helpful to provide an example of a semver tag that wasn't being handled correctly before the modification. Finally, I encourage the author to add tests to verify that the changes work as expected. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo wuhuizuo@126.com