-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Store variables and constraints in separate dictionaries #2
Comments
There are three possible styles:
|
…age (WIP) Replaces difficult to maintain `@emvariable` and @emconstraint` macros by on-the-fly generated thin JuMP extensions. Should be easy to maintain and provide a similar set of features. Fixes #2.
Less magical about constraint variables is unfortunately not possible using the current format of JuMP extensions. We're storing variables and constraints side-by-side in an |
ie. be less magical about whether one is handling a variable or a parameter.
Maybe provide getters
var
/con
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: