-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 251
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure complete set of carriers #633
Comments
could be part of |
yes, good idea |
These are all carrier names from all components that is not included in n.carrier. As you can see, at least since the merger of pypsa-eur and pypsa-eur-sec, the term "carrier" has shifted away from meaning the energy carrier according to https://pypsa.readthedocs.io/en/latest/components.html#carrier into a way to categorize component with different properties.
|
We should ensure that all carriers, that are used in the network, are actually listed in
n.carriers
withnice_name
andcolor
.For the set of existent carriers use
set.union(*[c.df.get("carrier", []) for c in n.iterate_components()])
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: