-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Python 3.13 support using legacy-cgi
#467
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd love to get this shipped in a bugfix release as 1.8.9 if we can just to unblock python 3.13.
Should I rebase to 1.8 branch? |
|
.github/workflows/ci-tests.yml
Outdated
# Linux and macOS don't have x86 python | ||
- os: "ubuntu-latest" | ||
architecture: x86 | ||
- os: "macos-latest" | ||
architecture: x86 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Has this been fixed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, that's a vestige of #468. I'll rebase the branch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it's all good, there are no errors!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line 44 in webob/.github/workflows/ci-tests.yml Line 44 in c3e3b5b
|
Or... I am sorry, do we want to keep x86 architecture stuff in? In that case a rebase may be better. I guess the only platform that it matters on is Windows. Feel free to rebase and nuke my commit to add x86 support back in. |
x86 support is already nuked by way of #468, so it shouldn't be in this PR. I'm going to rebase to keep things tidy. |
Done. |
Thanks @luhn |
A quick fix for #437 while #466 is in progress.