-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 862
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve type annotations (add more and fix wrong ones) #1394
Conversation
The origins of these are three-fold: * Merging in stubs from https://github.com/python/typeshed/tree/main/stubs/Markdown using "merge-pyi" - Note: we can consider these annotations to be the important ones because it's what people have been adding according to their own need * Double-checking around places where stubs were already added from the above, particularly conflicts with annotations that got added in this repository already + Taking the opportunity to declare a generic "Registry of T" class * Running mypy and eliminating the most glaring errors it reported
So there appears to be a couple code changes included in this (I don't mean adjustments to whitespace/line length). Could you please remove those? They should be submitted separately. |
I only recognized one change that's clearly not about type annotations and reverted it. I'm not sure if you also mean the NamedTuple change (which I think is on topic, as it's just the way to spell the same thing but with type annotations) or if there was something else. |
I was thinking of the NameTuples, but you are correct, they do have type annotations. So nevermind on that. |
Thanks for this. Some of the wrong annotations I completely missed. I'll merge this after a changelog entry is added. |
That is done |
For future reference:
|
Note that you have a conflict with the changelog (presumably with #1392). Regarding a fully correct type-checked codebase (according to "mypy") that is probably a reasonable goal. Personally, I haven't really explored what's involved given that this is a rather new thing for Python. So contributions are welcome. |
Hm? I had already merged to resolve the conflict. There was just the spelling check failing
Great, so I'll continue looking into this soon (in a separate PR) |
This PR almost closes #1389 🙂 |
Oh I didn't see that! |
Oh OK I thought there was just the |
The origins of these are three-fold: