-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Noncollinear and spin-orbit implementation for k-point Hamiltonian in AFQMC #2734
Merged
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b318dd9
fixed issues with noncollinear in Walkers
mmorale3 d94f74b
changes to readWfn
mmorale3 5d8d446
working commit, making changes to KPFactorizedHamiltonian, not yet done
mmorale3 67753f1
fixed HamOps unit test to handle all types, fixed cholesky rotation r…
mmorale3 8cc9a13
noncollinear changes to SlaterDetOps and Wfn, unit tests in both pass…
mmorale3 41afd00
fixed noncollienar issues in SlaterDetOps, BasePropagator and KP3 HOps
mmorale3 cc45a76
fixed issues on gpu with recent noncollinear changes, all unit tests …
mmorale3 f86d1df
small bug fix on single precision gpu build
mmorale3 288629e
fix small bug with padding of H1 in GPU
mmorale3 cac1b99
Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/QMCPACK/qmcpack into spi…
mmorale3 2b504c2
Merge branch 'develop' into spinorbit
mmorale3 05fb232
small bug fix
mmorale3 f74ccfc
Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/QMCPACK/qmcpack into spi…
mmorale3 e0886fc
Merge branch 'spinorbit' of https://github.com/mmorale3/qmcpack into …
mmorale3 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
229 changes: 154 additions & 75 deletions
229
src/AFQMC/HamiltonianOperations/KP3IndexFactorization.hpp
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why 16?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a temporary fix until we update multi.
Cuda is incompatible with alignof() for std::complex, so using alignof(T) in general
causes alignment issues when compiled in double precision for gpus.
With 16 all the regular types work fine. (Notice that cudamalloc aligns to 256).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we update multi?