Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix UnitaryGate.qasm() with unused qubits (backport #8234) #8243

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 24, 2022

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jun 24, 2022

This is an automatic backport of pull request #8234 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

The OpenQASM 2 exporter has a special case for providing `gate`
definitions, which was implemented purely for `UnitaryGate`.  This is
stateful per instruction, and does not generally behave well with the
rest of the exporter.  This commit fixes one misbehaviour: the way the
qubit operands for the definition was calculated was unreliable in both
order and number of qubits, if any of the qubits were unaffected by
the gate operation.

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8d5e3ca)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2022 19:20
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@jakelishman jakelishman added Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog automerge labels Jun 24, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit d7f932c into stable/0.21 Jun 24, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.21/pr-8234 branch June 24, 2022 21:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants