Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix transpile() with a Target containing an ideal Measure (backport #8995) #9020

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2022

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Oct 28, 2022

This is an automatic backport of pull request #8995 done by Mergify.


Mergify commands and options

More conditions and actions can be found in the documentation.

You can also trigger Mergify actions by commenting on this pull request:

  • @Mergifyio refresh will re-evaluate the rules
  • @Mergifyio rebase will rebase this PR on its base branch
  • @Mergifyio update will merge the base branch into this PR
  • @Mergifyio backport <destination> will backport this PR on <destination> branch

Additionally, on Mergify dashboard you can:

  • look at your merge queues
  • generate the Mergify configuration with the config editor.

Finally, you can contact us on https://mergify.com

This commit fixes an oversight in the transpile() function when running
with a Target (either directly or via a backend) that contains a
Measurement operation that is ideal (either globally or locally) with no
properties defined. This was not handled correctly in the function used
to convert a Target to a BackendProperties payload for passes that are
not yet target aware and this would cause an exception to be raised.
This commit fixes this edge case and excludes readout properties from
the generated BackendProperties in this case.

Fixes #8969

Co-authored-by: mergify[bot] <37929162+mergify[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 72ba2ee)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 28, 2022 05:28
@qiskit-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for opening a new pull request.

Before your PR can be merged it will first need to pass continuous integration tests and be reviewed. Sometimes the review process can be slow, so please be patient.

While you're waiting, please feel free to review other open PRs. While only a subset of people are authorized to approve pull requests for merging, everyone is encouraged to review open pull requests. Doing reviews helps reduce the burden on the core team and helps make the project's code better for everyone.

One or more of the the following people are requested to review this:

  • @Qiskit/terra-core

@jakelishman jakelishman added Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog automerge labels Oct 28, 2022
@mergify mergify bot merged commit bcec3b9 into stable/0.22 Oct 28, 2022
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.22/pr-8995 branch October 28, 2022 10:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Bugfix Include in the "Fixed" section of the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants