boards/sipeed_longan_nano: separate board definition for Sipeed Longan Nano TFT #19824
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gschorcht
requested review from
leandrolanzieri,
jia200x and
MrKevinWeiss
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
Area: doc
4 tasks
gschorcht
added
Type: enhancement
4 tasks
gschorcht
requested review from
miri64,
smlng,
aabadie,
MichelRottleuthner and
fjmolinas
as code owners
github-actions
bot
added
Area: tests
This commit introduces a separate board definition based on the `sipeed-longan-nano` board definition for the TFT version of the Sipeed Longan Nano board.
gschorcht
force-pushed
the
boards/sipeed-longan-nano-tft
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f550bb5 to
c5faf34
Compare
benpicco
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2023
|
bors merge |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2023
19824: boards/sipeed_longan_nano: separate board definition for Sipeed Longan Nano TFT r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR provides a minimal separate board definition for the Sipeed Longan Nano version with TFT display which is just an extension of `boards/sipeed-longan-nano` with enabled TFT display module. From the lessons we had to learn with the Kconfig modelling of optional hardware, the TFT version of the Sipeed Longan Nano board has been split off into its own board definition based on the existing Siepeed Longan Nano board. Commits ba29a5e, 237819e, 6d8b56d and c5faf34 are small cleanups of peripheral configurations and could be split from this PR as follow-up PR (changes +70 -36). ### Testing procedure Green CI ``` BOARD=sipeed-longan-nano-tft make -j8 -C tests/drivers/st77xx flash ``` should work ### Issues/PRs references Follow up to PR #19813 and PR #19814 Prerequisite for PR #19825 and PR #19827 19855: gnrc_static: fix static PID assignment r=benpicco a=benpicco Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net> Co-authored-by: Benjamin Valentin <benjamin.valentin@bht-berlin.de>
|
Build failed (retrying...): |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 7, 2023
19824: boards/sipeed_longan_nano: separate board definition for Sipeed Longan Nano TFT r=benpicco a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR provides a minimal separate board definition for the Sipeed Longan Nano version with TFT display which is just an extension of `boards/sipeed-longan-nano` with enabled TFT display module. From the lessons we had to learn with the Kconfig modelling of optional hardware, the TFT version of the Sipeed Longan Nano board has been split off into its own board definition based on the existing Siepeed Longan Nano board. Commits ba29a5e, 237819e, 6d8b56d and c5faf34 are small cleanups of peripheral configurations and could be split from this PR as follow-up PR (changes +70 -36). ### Testing procedure Green CI ``` BOARD=sipeed-longan-nano-tft make -j8 -C tests/drivers/st77xx flash ``` should work ### Issues/PRs references Follow up to PR #19813 and PR #19814 Prerequisite for PR #19825 and PR #19827 Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
This commit includes the following cleanups: - The macros `I2C_DEV_1_USED` and `SPI_DEV_1_USED` are now used with the values 0 and 1. This allows to enable but also to disable the second interface even if the board definition enables it by default. - The second I2C device `I2C_DEV(1)` and the second SPI device `SPI_DEV(1)` are now disabled by default. - The second SPI device `SPI_DEV(1)` now uses PB5 as default CS signal instead of PA4 to keep PA4 free for ADC or DAC even if `SPI_DEV(1)` is used, for example for the TFT display.
After cleaning up the default config of SPI, this commit cleans up the configuration for `sipeed-longan-nano` a bit: - PA4 is no longer used as default CS for `SPI_DEV(1)` - At least one DAC channel PA4 is always available if DAC is used. - PA4 is always available as ADC channel if DAC is not used. - The order of ADC and DAC channels has been changed accordingly.
gschorcht
force-pushed
the
boards/sipeed-longan-nano-tft
branch
from
c5faf34 to
41daa18
Compare
|
Canceled. |
@benpicco Thanks for reviewing and approving the PR. Unfortunatly, I had forgotten to remove a space I had introduced to trigger a syntax error for testing compilations with different configurations here I removed the space and squashed it directly. |
|
Now the compilation failed due to the unrelated error with |
gschorcht
added
CI: ready for build
|
yup, that is some flakey results that I guess we didn't fix, we can try again. |
|
bors merge |
|
🕐 Waiting for PR status (GitHub check) to be set, probably by CI. Bors will automatically try to run when all required PR statuses are set. |
|
bors merge |
|
Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2023
19825: drivers: rename st7735 to more generic st77xx r=aabadie a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR provides the following changes: - renames the driver `st7735` to `st77xx` - renames the test `st7735` to `st77xx` - models controller variants as pseudomodules `st7735`, `st7789` and `st7796` - removes the buggy initialization as a workaround to use reset defaults, see issue #19818 - adds backward compatibility header files for `ST7735_PARAM_*` symbols - adds a test board for compilation test of backward compatibility - updates the corresponding board definitions The PR should solve the remaining dependency issues in KConfig we had by using `st7735` module for different controller variants. The backward compatibility header files should work for boards that still use `ST7735_PARAM_*` in their board definitions so that the board defintions at user's side use shouldn't be affected. ~To be compilable, the PR includes PR #19824.~ ### Testing procedure - Green CI - `tests/drivers/disp_dev` and `tests/drivers/st77xx` should still work for all boards using a ST77xx display. - The PR was already tested for these tests for: - [x] `adafruit-pybadge` - [x] `esp32s2-lilygo-ttgo-t8` - [x] `esp32s3-usb-otg` - [x] `sipeed-longan-nano` ### Issues/PRs references Workaround for issue #19818 Preqruisite for PR #19827 Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
19827: drivers/st77xx: implement initialization r=aabadie a=gschorcht ### Contribution description This PR implements correct initialization for ST7735, ST7789 and ST7796. A number of configuration parameters are exposed via Kconfig. The user can decide whether to use custom configuration parameters or reset defaults. ~To be compilable, the PR includes PR #19824 and PR #19825~ ### Testing procedure - Green CI - `tests/drivers/disp_dev` and `tests/drivers/st77xx` should still work for all boards using a ST77xx display. - The PR was already tested for these tests for: - [x] `adafruit-pybadge` - [x] `esp32s2-lilygo-ttgo-t8` - [x] `esp32s3-usb-otg` - [x] `sipeed-longan-nano` ### Issues/PRs references ~Depends on #19825~ Fixes #19818 Co-authored-by: Gunar Schorcht <gunar@schorcht.net>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contribution description
This PR provides a minimal separate board definition for the Sipeed Longan Nano version with TFT display which is just an extension of
boards/sipeed-longan-nanowith enabled TFT display module.From the lessons we had to learn with the Kconfig modelling of optional hardware, the TFT version of the Sipeed Longan Nano board has been split off into its own board definition based on the existing Siepeed Longan Nano board.
Commits ba29a5e, 237819e, 6d8b56d and c5faf34 are small cleanups of peripheral configurations and could be split from this PR as follow-up PR (changes +70 -36).
Testing procedure
Green CI
should work
Issues/PRs references
Follow up to PR #19813 and PR #19814
Prerequisite for PR #19825 and PR #19827