Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changed rotor inconsistency_ab #78

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2019
Merged

Changed rotor inconsistency_ab #78

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2019

Conversation

alongd
Copy link
Member

@alongd alongd commented Mar 5, 2019

to be a fraction of the max scan energy rather than absolute energy.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #78 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 75%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #78   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.09%   41.09%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines        4847     4847           
  Branches     1256     1256           
=======================================
  Hits         1992     1992           
  Misses       2540     2540           
  Partials      315      315
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
arc/scheduler.py 18.08% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
arc/settings.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ca0a264...ac05f5c. Read the comment docs.

@alongd alongd force-pushed the incons_az branch 3 times, most recently from 63ad355 to d8ee67e Compare March 5, 2019 15:49
to be a fraction of the max scan energy rather than absolute energy.
@alongd alongd changed the title Changed rotor inconsistency_az Changed rotor inconsistency_ab Mar 5, 2019
@alongd alongd merged commit 4c0d38b into master Mar 5, 2019
@alongd alongd deleted the incons_az branch March 5, 2019 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant