fix: update redocly.yaml validation

[tatomyr]

What/Why/How?

Redocly config validation update.
Copied and pasted validation schemas from the Portal, and added additional 'rules' validation (metadata-schema and custom-fields-schema).

Reference

Testing

Tested on Portal playground's and Rebilly redocly.yaml files.

Screenshots (optional)

Check yourself

• Code is linted
• Tested with redoc/reference-docs/workflows (internal)
• All new/updated code is covered with tests

Security

• Security impact of change has been considered
• Code follows company security practices and guidelines

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 26c4e6b

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 2 packages

Name	Type
@redocly/openapi-core	Patch
@redocly/cli	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
redocly lint packages/core/src/benchmark/benches/rebilly.yaml	1.365 ± 0.030	1.333	1.436	1.00
redocly-next lint packages/core/src/benchmark/benches/rebilly.yaml	1.389 ± 0.026	1.359	1.430	1.02 ± 0.03

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟡	Statements	75.44%	3793/5028
🟡	Branches	66.3%	2103/3172
🟡	Functions	68.6%	638/930
🟡	Lines	75.59%	3543/4687

Show new covered files 🐣

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟢	... / portal-config-schema.ts	100%	100%	100%	100%
🟢	... / theme-config.ts	100%	100%	100%	100%

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟡	... / redocly-yaml.ts	79.28% (-1.09% 🔻)	34.38% (-4.91% 🔻)	55.56%	79.09% (-1.1% 🔻)

Test suite run success

625 tests passing in 91 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 26c4e6b

[lornajane]

Are we asking docs in this pull request, or capturing in an issue what we need to add later? Link the issue if its separate

[tatomyr]

@lornajane I don't think there's something to be documented here. We are only catching up with the Portal config, no changes to the CLI config itself.

[SmoliyY]

It also will be great to see some e2e test for validation of config.
At least for cases with metadata-schema and custom-fields-schema

[lornajane]

Got it. I thought we were also adopting the rules and would need docs. Now I see it's just the validation

[tatomyr]

@SmoliyY I see your point, but those don't make sense in the CLI itself as they are not quite rules and are only related to the Portal.