Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade socket.io from 2.4.1 to 3.0.0 #429

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andersonsevla
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • backend/package.json
  • backend/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
  768  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)

…rabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
@backstage-rdstation
Copy link

Olá!

Obrigado por enviar o pull request para corrigir uma vulnerabilidade nas dependências do projeto. No entanto, para melhorar a qualidade da descrição do pull request, sugiro adicionar mais informações.

Você poderia explicar de forma clara o motivo da correção estar sendo feita, incluindo o contexto histórico da mudança, a justificativa da correção ou o racional por trás dela. Além disso, seria interessante incluir uma seção com o passo a passo ou as etapas necessárias para testar essa correção na prática.

Essas informações adicionais ajudarão a equipe a entender melhor o propósito do pull request e a realizar os testes necessários de forma mais eficiente.

Fico à disposição para ajudar com qualquer dúvida ou orientação adicional.

Obrigado pela colaboração!

Esse comentário foi gerado por inteligência artificial

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants