Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 7 vulnerabilities #435

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sa-secrd
Copy link

@sa-secrd sa-secrd commented Sep 6, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 7 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • backend/package.json
  • backend/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
critical severity Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-SOCKETIOPARSER-3091012
  704  
high severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908
  696  
high severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-SEMVER-3247795
  696  
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
  696  
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-HTTPCACHESEMANTICS-3248783
  586  
low severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-MINIMIST-2429795
  506  
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-MINIMATCH-3050818
  479  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Prototype Pollution
🦉 Improper Input Validation

@backstage-rdstation
Copy link

A descrição do pull request não foi encontrada nos resultados da pesquisa. Vamos analisar o texto fornecido para avaliar de acordo com os critérios estabelecidos.
O texto do pull request não atende aos critérios estabelecidos:

  1. Não explica claramente o motivo do pull request, apenas menciona que foi criado para corrigir vulnerabilidades nas dependências do projeto.
  2. Não inclui uma seção retratando o passo a passo ou as etapas necessárias para testar o pull request na prática.

É importante escrever uma descrição de pull request que explique o contexto histórico da mudança, a justificativa da mudança e inclua instruções de teste para garantir uma comunicação clara e eficaz.

Esse comentário foi gerado por inteligência artificial

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants