C# generator: create anoymous types with camel casing #1716
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an attempt to fix RicoSuter/NSwag#4849 and RicoSuter/NSwag#4837: since NSwag 14, the resulting C# file generated from a yaml file might contain lower case class names.
This seems to happen if an array item has as lower case type name hint (e.g. "data"), and a class "Data" was already generated.
In this situation,
DefaultTypeNameGenerator.GenerateAnonymousTypeNamedoes not callConversionUtilities.ConvertToUpperCamelCaseand thus picks the lower case class name "data" as "not used".I have no idea why this worked with NSwag 13 and what broke it.
With my fix, it would generate a class "Data2" again.
Hope you don't force me to add a test case - for me it happens with a large closed source yaml file, and the open source file from the other bug report is also large. And I am not a yaml specialist...