This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
Refactor bindings, introducing joinBindings #208
Merged
+307
−109
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8a76308
Refactor bindings, introducing joinBindings
LPGhatguy 3505253
Merge branch 'master' into refactor-bindings
LPGhatguy 9a99374
Address trivial review feedback
LPGhatguy 2b1a4f6
Fix CSS for MkDocs 4.x
LPGhatguy 69852df
Docs, sort of
LPGhatguy bff1e23
Update CHANGELOG and docs
LPGhatguy 7202c15
Add PR number to changelog entry
LPGhatguy 783c896
Merge branch 'master' into refactor-bindings
LPGhatguy ef40422
Merge branch 'master' into refactor-bindings
LPGhatguy 35b5ec4
Fix test with unused variable
LPGhatguy 9d72e74
Add test coverage for disconnecting joined bindings
LPGhatguy fa8be88
Add tests for updating bindings directly
LPGhatguy ac32d5d
Update API reference
LPGhatguy File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make more sense to only subscribe to
upstreamBindings
once and create/destroy the upstream connections depending on if there are subscribers or not? The prior implementation does this.Upstream connections could easily add up, considering bindings mapped from this one will invoke
subscribe
when subscribed to. A good example of this potentially becoming a problem would be when animating transparency.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just got back into working on this!
I don't think it's a big deal to pass subscriptions up through to their parents. At the end of the day, someone is going to have to track the connection, and consolidating that at the top is the simplest approach!