Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Mark private/internal segments as unused #682

Closed
lars-reimann opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #710
Closed

Mark private/internal segments as unused #682

lars-reimann opened this issue Oct 23, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #710
Assignees
@lars-reimann
Labels
enhancement 💡 New feature or request released Included in a release validation ✔️ Improved or new static checks

Comments

@lars-reimann
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Private/internal segments are meant to be used inside a project. However, currently we provide no feedback if they are not used.

Desired solution

Show a warning (with the unused tag) if a segment is never referenced. We should exclude references from inside the segment itself.

Possible alternatives (optional)

No response

Screenshots (optional)

No response

Additional Context (optional)

No response
@lars-reimann lars-reimann added enhancement 💡 New feature or request validation ✔️ Improved or new static checks labels Oct 23, 2023
@lars-reimann lars-reimann added this to DSL Oct 23, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog in DSL Oct 23, 2023
@lars-reimann lars-reimann self-assigned this Oct 30, 2023
@lars-reimann lars-reimann moved this from Backlog to Todo in DSL Oct 30, 2023
@lars-reimann lars-reimann moved this from Todo to In Progress in DSL Oct 30, 2023
@lars-reimann lars-reimann mentioned this issue Oct 30, 2023
Merged
@lars-reimann lars-reimann linked a pull request Oct 30, 2023 that will close this issue
feat: mark unused internal/private segments as unnecessary #710
Merged
lars-reimann added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2023
@lars-reimann
feat: mark unused internal/private segments as unnecessary (#710)
3ba8698 
Closes #682

### Summary of Changes

Show a warning if internal/private segments are unused and mark them as
unnecessary.
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to ✔️ Done in DSL Oct 30, 2023
lars-reimann pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2023
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): 0.3.0 [skip ci]
1c5fb9f 
## [0.3.0](v0.2.0...v0.3.0) (2023-11-12)

### Features

* annotations for the purity of functions ([#709](#709)) ([9d342e4](9d342e4)), closes [#559](#559)
* call hierarchy provider ([#735](#735)) ([168d098](168d098)), closes [#680](#680)
* compute type of elvis operators with nullable left operand ([#715](#715)) ([376b083](376b083)), closes [#541](#541)
* customize rendering of `[@param](https://github.com/param)`, `[@Result](https://github.com/result)`, and `[@type](https://github.com/type)Param` tags ([#764](#764)) ([e049148](e049148)), closes [#669](#669)
* ensure an overriding member matches the overridden one ([#758](#758)) ([a698a6a](a698a6a)), closes [#639](#639)
* error if callable type is used in wrong context ([#763](#763)) ([9b1522f](9b1522f)), closes [#713](#713)
* error if type parameter is used in nested named type declaration ([#750](#750)) ([52374aa](52374aa)), closes [#748](#748)
* info if overriding member is not needed ([#759](#759)) ([23b340e](23b340e)), closes [#25](#25)
* mark constraint lists as experimental ([#752](#752)) ([d48e1e0](d48e1e0)), closes [#18](#18)
* mark type parameter lists and type argument lists as experimental ([#755](#755)) ([f1a052a](f1a052a)), closes [#753](#753)
* mark unused internal/private segments as unnecessary ([#710](#710)) ([3ba8698](3ba8698)), closes [#682](#682)
* minor improvements for purity info ([#728](#728)) ([8d59607](8d59607))
* partially evaluate lambdas and segments ([#734](#734)) ([c40347c](c40347c)), closes [#603](#603)
* scoping for inherited members ([#706](#706)) ([4518aee](4518aee)), closes [#540](#540)
* scoping for member access on literals and literal types ([#754](#754)) ([e60e456](e60e456)), closes [#80](#80)
* scoping for references to containing declarations ([#708](#708)) ([3762c36](3762c36)), closes [#540](#540)
* show an error if a pure parameter does not have a callable type ([#736](#736)) ([6c52868](6c52868)), closes [#729](#729)
* show error if own declaration has same name as core one ([#762](#762)) ([8cb2120](8cb2120)), closes [#760](#760)
* signature help ([#724](#724)) ([ed33676](ed33676)), closes [#24](#24)
* Source Maps for Code Generation ([#714](#714)) ([64b9e07](64b9e07)), closes [#30](#30)
* tooltips for inlay hints ([#721](#721)) ([3e71cad](3e71cad))
* type checker service ([#722](#722)) ([daad5c4](daad5c4)), closes [#666](#666)
* type checking ([#723](#723)) ([a9eb3bb](a9eb3bb)), closes [#666](#666)
* type checking for list & map literals ([#751](#751)) ([dc14223](dc14223)), closes [#712](#712)
* type hierarchy provider ([#737](#737)) ([9fd5f0c](9fd5f0c)), closes [#681](#681)
* VS Code snippets ([#757](#757)) ([fd6f432](fd6f432)), closes [#756](#756)

### Bug Fixes

* assignability of static type to callable type ([#725](#725)) ([1d17900](1d17900))
* NPEs during validation ([#727](#727)) ([4b8196f](4b8196f))
* prevent overwriting core declarations ([#761](#761)) ([36663ca](36663ca))
* prevent references to following parameters from default values ([#707](#707)) ([182d64b](182d64b)), closes [#540](#540)
* setup of CLI ([#698](#698)) ([0b5d90d](0b5d90d))
@lars-reimann lars-reimann added the released Included in a release label Nov 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lars-reimann lars-reimann

Labels
enhancement 💡 New feature or request released Included in a release validation ✔️ Improved or new static checks
Projects
DSL
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

feat: mark unused internal/private segments as unnecessary Safe-DS/DSL
1 participant
@lars-reimann