Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

M dwarfs tess #33

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

arjunsavel
Copy link

Short notebook for finding flares in TESS — related to the HST M dwarf notebook, loosely.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@
{
Copy link

@ttdu ttdu Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a great intro. Make sure to add some links to background information about M Dwarfs. Also it would be cool to link to a paper on the habitability of planets around M Dwarfs, my quick google search yielded this paper: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.10127


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@
{
Copy link

@ttdu ttdu Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should briefly describe what's in the other notebook (~1-2 sentences), then put a [link here]. I'll make sure that when the notebooks go live, an appropriate link is added


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@
{
Copy link

@ttdu ttdu Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having read through this section, I think you should motivate iterating through the "removing variability" steps. Why are we cleaning twice?


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@
{
Copy link

@ttdu ttdu Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This cleaned data looks.... ok. The first lightcurve in the list actually looks a little better to my eye; is there a reason you went with this one?


Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ttdu this lightcurve was one of the lightcurves with more easily parseable periodograms. I could mention this in the intro, if that's helpful!

@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@
{
Copy link

@ttdu ttdu Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #2.    sigma_2 = convolve(np.square(cleaned_twice - running_mean), g)

This 'g' factor does not appear in the notebook, so this cell failed when I ran it.


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@
{
Copy link

@ttdu ttdu Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why 6 minutes? Motivate this.


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@
{
Copy link

@ttdu ttdu Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like some extra-long flares are getting marked twice. Should we perhaps raise our standards to 8 or 10 minutes? Or would this exclude too many flares?


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1285 @@
{
Copy link

@ttdu ttdu Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is great motivation for this section.


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1328 @@
{
Copy link

@kelle kelle Nov 16, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't need this heading.


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,1328 @@
{
Copy link

@kelle kelle Nov 16, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove your email address.


Reply via ReviewNB

@kelle
Copy link

kelle commented Nov 16, 2022

@arjunsavel , Please give another round of polish taking into account Tom and my comments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants