Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 19, 2021. It is now read-only.

When LOCAL_NIDS_RULE_TUNING was set to "yes" on a sensor, the update … #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 30, 2016

Conversation

DavidJBianco
Copy link
Contributor

When LOCAL_NIDS_RULE_TUNING was set to "yes" on a sensor, the update process would complain that "-T" was not a valid option for su, causing rules to never get updated properly. Of course, this is supposed to be an option for PulledPork.

Looks like there is similar code to call PP in two places (for the sensor, for the server). It was fixed on the server call, but not where it was called on the sensor. This fixes that.

…process

would complain that "-T" was not a valid option for su.  Of course, this is
supposed to be an option for PulledPork.  Looks like there is similar code to
call PP in two places (for the sensor, for the server).  It was fixed on the
server call, but not where it was called on the sensor.  This fixes that.
@dougburks
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, David!

@dougburks
Copy link
Contributor

I've created Issue 892 to track this:
Security-Onion-Solutions/security-onion#892

@DavidJBianco
Copy link
Contributor Author

Well, that was quick!

On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 at 11:19 Doug Burks notifications@github.com wrote:

I've created Issue 892 to track this:
Security-Onion-Solutions/security-onion#892
Security-Onion-Solutions/security-onion#892


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment)

@dougburks dougburks merged commit 025534b into Security-Onion-Solutions:master Mar 30, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants