-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make ignore role standard unless otherwise specified #296
Comments
I understand the unfriendliness of the current design when most of the columns must be set to I'll check further the best solution but I'll probably add an attribute at the level of the |
I was talking to Wim last week about a possible non mandatory attribute remarking default behavior. That might be a slightly more elegant solution. |
How could a use case look like to ignore columns? I never select columns I don't test for, that's why I ask. |
@FuegoArtificial If you've a stored procedure returning 3 columns (1 key and two values), the best practice is to have two tests, one checking the first value-column and ignoring the second and a second with the opposite configuration. Another case is when you've a CSV file with many information including the few columns that you need for your assertion. |
ah okay, that makes sense. |
Finally, I just added an option to specify |
Available in beta: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Seddryck/nbi/build/1.16.0-beta.20.build.18 |
Example:
Columns that are not to be included in the test are currently marked with the ignore keyword. On big tables of which you only want to check one or two columns you have to specify ignore on all the others.
The feature proposition is: Make ignore standard behavior unless specified otherwise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: