Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.9.x] Allow search request field mapping to be configured + layered navigation attributes #2272

Conversation

botisSmile
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@botisSmile botisSmile force-pushed the feat-ESP-252-fix-Boolean-and-filter-field-mapping-2.9.x branch from acb79b5 to 9f0d7bf Compare October 5, 2021 14:06
@botisSmile botisSmile changed the title Allow search request field mapping to be configured from di.xml [2.9.x] Allow search request field mapping to be configured + special attributes Oct 6, 2021
@botisSmile botisSmile force-pushed the feat-ESP-252-fix-Boolean-and-filter-field-mapping-2.9.x branch 2 times, most recently from 7b83b11 to 4b0b168 Compare October 6, 2021 16:39
@botisSmile botisSmile marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2021 17:48
@botisSmile botisSmile force-pushed the feat-ESP-252-fix-Boolean-and-filter-field-mapping-2.9.x branch 2 times, most recently from 1ce5c5d to 273c901 Compare October 12, 2021 15:19
 * Add layered navigation attributes management
 * Add No value filter for boolean
 * Fix applying boolean filters on GraphQL
@botisSmile botisSmile force-pushed the feat-ESP-252-fix-Boolean-and-filter-field-mapping-2.9.x branch from 273c901 to 58983db Compare October 12, 2021 15:26
@botisSmile botisSmile changed the title [2.9.x] Allow search request field mapping to be configured + special attributes [2.9.x] Allow search request field mapping to be configured + layered navigation attributes Oct 12, 2021
@romainruaud romainruaud merged commit 5f2ab9d into Smile-SA:2.9.x Oct 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants