-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expressed realms 169 add backend for sub section edit #171
Merged
noremacskich
merged 12 commits into
main
from
ExpressedRealms-169-AddBackendForSubSectionEdit
Oct 16, 2024
Merged
Expressed realms 169 add backend for sub section edit #171
noremacskich
merged 12 commits into
main
from
ExpressedRealms-169-AddBackendForSubSectionEdit
Oct 16, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
noremacskich
commented
Oct 16, 2024
- Created Copy of the expression table repo, and renamed things to say text section
- Moved logic for page load into sub section stuff
- Creating an expression section should now be fully in place
- Edit should now be in place
- Delete should now be updated
- Fully implemented getting expression details This includes getting possible parents
- Create and Edit now handle Parent Id Fixed recursion issues
- Split out the options stuff into separate call It now is compatible with both create and edit actions
This includes getting possible parents
Fixed recursion issues
It now is compatible with both create and edit actions
🦙 MegaLinter status:
|
Descriptor | Linter | Files | Fixed | Errors | Elapsed time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
✅ CSHARP | csharpier | 20 | 0 | 6.03s | |
✅ REPOSITORY | checkov | yes | no | 19.74s | |
✅ REPOSITORY | dustilock | yes | no | 0.98s | |
✅ REPOSITORY | gitleaks | yes | no | 1.01s | |
✅ REPOSITORY | git_diff | yes | no | 0.02s | |
grype | yes | 5 | 18.83s | ||
✅ REPOSITORY | secretlint | yes | no | 2.91s | |
✅ REPOSITORY | syft | yes | no | 0.78s | |
✅ REPOSITORY | trivy | yes | no | 10.35s | |
✅ REPOSITORY | trivy-sbom | yes | no | 2.08s | |
✅ REPOSITORY | trufflehog | yes | no | 9.77s |
See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
Set VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASE: true
in mega-linter.yml to validate all sources, not only the diff
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.