-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: ensure that compute functions are running as non-root #228
Conversation
85ed65f
to
274b2d0
Compare
/e2e --tests=substrafl,mnist,doc |
59627a2
to
ba33753
Compare
/e2e --tests=substrafl |
End to end tests: ✔️ SUCCESS |
Signed-off-by: SdgJlbl <sarah.diot-girard@owkin.com>
ba33753
to
9086b1e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice job! On minor question tho
# create a non-root user | ||
RUN addgroup --gid 1001 group | ||
RUN adduser --disabled-password --gecos "" --uid 1001 --gid 1001 --home /home/user user | ||
ENV PYTHONPATH /home/user | ||
WORKDIR /home/user | ||
USER user | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we somehow factorize some of this and reuse part of the DOCKERFILE_TEMPLATE
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is part of the test. We are checking that the dockerfile template is what we expect it to be.
Else, we would just be checking that Python f-strings are working as intended, and that should be tested in the standard library :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant, I think we could avoid updating twice the constant part (where we just run commands that does not depend on anything else) and extract it in a dedicated variable that could be re-injected in the expected result (precisely because we can assume that (f-)strings work as intended) so the test actually focus on the templating part. But no big deal.
Related issue
fixes FL-1664
Summary
Notes
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements