A Clojure DSL to query in memory triple models with a SPARQL like language. Matcha provides simple BGP (Basic Graph Pattern) style queries on in memory graphs of linked data triples.
Whilst Matcha is intended to query RDF models it can also be used to query arbitrary clojure data, so long as it consists of Clojure values stored in 3/tuple vectors, each entity of the triple is assumed to follow Clojure value equality semantics.
The primary use cases for Matcha are to make handling graphs of RDF
data easy by querying data with SPARQL-like queries. A typical
workflow is to CONSTRUCT
data from a backend SPARQL query, and then
use Matcha to query this graph locally.
- SPARQL-like BGP queries across multiple triple patterns.
- Parameterised queries using just clojure
let
. - Ability to index your database, with
index-triples
. In order to be queried Matcha needs to have indexed the data; if your data is unindexed it will index it before running the query, and then dispose of the index. This can lead to poor performance when you want to query the same set of data multiple times. - Construct graph query results directly into clojure datastructures.
- Support for
VALUES
clauses (unlike in SPARQL we do not yet support binding arbitrary tuples/tables). So we only support theVALUES ?x { ... }
form. - Support for
OPTIONAL
s with SPARQL-like semantics.
The initial implementation is macro heavy. This means use cases where you want to dynamically create in memory queries may be more awkward.
Currently there is no support for the following SPARQL-like features:
- Reasoning on in memory vocabularies with RDFS (maybe OWL)
- Clojurescript support (planned)
Matcha defines some primary query functions select
, select-1
,
build
, build-1
, construct
, construct-1
and ask
.
First lets define an in memory database of triples, in reality this
could come from a SPARQL query CONSTRUCT
, but here we'll just define
some RDF-like data inline.
Triples can be vectors of clojure values or any datastructure that
supports positional destructuring via clojure.lang.Indexed
, this
allows Matcha to work grafter.rdf.protocols.Statement
records.
Matcha works with any clojure values in the triples, be they java
URI's, or clojure keywords.
(def friends-db [[:rick :rdfs/label "Rick"]
[:martin :rdfs/label "Martin"]
[:katie :rdfs/label "Katie"]
[:julie :rdfs/label "Julie"]
[:rick :foaf/knows :martin]
[:rick :foaf/knows :katie]
[:katie :foaf/knows :julie]
[:rick :a :foaf/Person]
[:katie :a :foaf/Person]
[:martin :a :foaf/Person]])
Now we can build our query functions:
There are two main concepts to Matcha queries. They typically define:
- a projection, which states what variables to return to your Clojure program, and the datastructure they should be returned in.
- a Basic Graph Pattern (BGP), that defines the pattern of the graph traversal.
BGPs have some semantics you need to be aware of:
- Clojure symbols beginning with a
?
are treated specially as query variables. - Other symbols are resolved to their values.
build
always groups returned solutions into a sequence of clojure
maps, where the subjects are grouped into maps, and the maps are
grouped by their properties. If a property has multiple values they
will be rolled up into a set, otherwise they will be a scalar value.
Each map returned by build
typically represents a resource in the
built graph, which is projected into a sequence of maps, with
potentially multi-valued keys.
It takes a binding for ?subject
of the map, a map form specifying
the projection of other property/value bindings a bgp
and a
database.
(build ?person
{:foaf/knows ?friends}
[[?person :foaf/knows ?friends]]
friends-db)
;; => ({:grafter.rdf/uri :rick, :foaf/knows #{:martin :katie}}
;; {:grafter.rdf/uri :katie, :foaf/knows :julie}
NOTE: :foaf/knows
is projected into a set of values for :rick
, but
a single scalar value for :katie
.
The ?subject
is by default associated with the key
:grafter.rdf/uri
. If you wish to specify this key yourself you can
by providing a key/value pair as the subject: e.g. substituting
?person for [:id ?person]
changes the return values like so:
(build [:id ?person]
{:foaf/knows ?friends}
[[?person :foaf/knows ?friends]]
friends-db)
;; => ({:id :rick, :foaf/knows #{:martin :katie}}
;; {:id :katie, :foaf/knows :julie}
Because build
knows it is always returning a sequence of maps, it
will remove any keys corresponding to unbound variables introduced
through optionals. This is unlike construct
.
select
compiles a query from your arguments, that returns results as a
sequence of tuples. It is directly analagous to SPARQL's SELECT
query.
The bgp
argument is analagous to a SPARQL WHERE
clause and should be
a BGP.
When called with one argument, select
projects all ?qvar
s used in the
query. This is analagous to SELECT *
in SPARQL:
(def rick-knows
(select
[[:rick :foaf/knows ?p2]
[?p2 :rdfs/label ?name]]))
(rick-knows friends-db)
;; => ["Martin" "Katie"]
When called with two arguments select
expects the first argument to be a
vector of variables to project into the solution sequence.
(def rick-knows (select [?name]
[[:rick :foaf/knows ?p2]
[?p2 :rdfs/label ?name]]))
(rick-knows friends-db)
;; => ["Martin" "Katie"]
There is also select-1
which is just like select
but returns just
the first solution.
NOTE: if you're using you construct
to return maps, you should first
consider using build
which fixes some issues present in common
construct
usage.
CONSTRUCT
s allow you to construct arbitrary clojure data structures
directly from your query results, and position the projected query
variables where ever you want within the projected datastructure
template.
Args:
construct-pattern
: an arbitrary clojure data structure. Results will be projected into the?qvar
"holes".bgps
: this argument is analagous to a SPARQLWHERE
clause and should be a BGPs.db-or-idx
: A matcha "database".
When called with two arguments construct
returns a query function
that accepts a db-or-idx
as its only argument. When called, the
function returns a sequence of matching tuples in the form of the
construct-pattern
.
(construct {:grafter.rdf/uri :rick
:foaf/knows {:grafter.rdf/uri ?p
:rdfs/label ?name}}
[[:rick :foaf/knows ?p]
[?p :rdfs/label ?name]])
;; => (fn [db-or-idx] ...)
When called with 3 arguments, queries the db-or-idx
directly, returning a
sequence of results in the form of the construct-pattern
.
(construct {:grafter.rdf/uri :rick
:foaf/knows {:grafter.rdf/uri ?p
:rdfs/label ?name}}
[[:rick :foaf/knows ?p]
[?p :rdfs/label ?name]]
friends-db)
;; => {:grafter.rdf/uri :rick
;; :foaf/knows #{{:grafter.rdf/uri :martin, :rdfs/label "Martin"}
;; {:grafter.rdf/uri :katie, :rdfs/label "Katie"}}}
Maps in a projection that contain the special key of
:grafter.rdf/uri
trigger extra behaviour, and cause the query
engine to group solutions by subject, and merge values into clojure
sets. For example in the above query you'll notice that foaf:knows
groups its solutions. If you don't want these maps to be grouped,
don't include the magic key :grafter.rdf/uri
in the top level
projection.
There is also construct-1
which is just like construct
but returns
only the first solution.
See the unit tests for more examples, including examples that use Matcha with Grafter Statements and vocabularies.
ask
is the only query that doesn't specify an explicit projection.
It accepts a BGP, like the other query types and returns a boolean
result if there were any matches found.
(def any-triples? (ask [[?s ?p ?o]])
(any-triples? friends-db) ;; => true
You can parameterise Matcha queries simply by adding a lexical binding or wrapping a function call over your Matcha query. For example
(defn lookup-friends [person-id database]
(->> database
(construct {:grafter.rdf/uri ?friend
:name ?name}
[[person-id :foaf/knows ?friend]
[?friend :rdfs/label ?name]]))
(lookup-friends :rick friends-db)
;; => [{:grafter.rdf/uri :martin, :name "Martin"}
;; {:grafter.rdf/uri :katie, :name "Katie"}]
We support SPARQL-like OPTIONAL
s in all query types with the following syntax:
(defn lookup-name [person-id database]
(select [?name]
[[person-id :a :foaf/Person]
(optional [[person :rdfs/label ?name]])
(optional [[person :foaf/name ?name]])]))
We support dynamic VALUEs clauses in all query types like so:
(defn lookup-names [person-ids database]
(select [?name]
[(values ?person-id person-ids)
[?person-id :rdfs/label ?name]]))
(lookup-names [:rick :katie] friends-db) ;; => ["Rick", "Katie"]
You can also hardcode the values into the query:
(defn lookup-names [person-ids database]
(select [?name]
[(values ?person-id [:rick :katie])
[?person-id :rdfs/label ?name]]))
Any "flat collection" (i.e. a sequential?
or a set?
) is valid
on the right hand side of a values
binding.
Matcha is intended to be used on modest sizes of data, typically thousands of triples, and usually no more than a few hundred thousand triples. Proper benchmarking hasn't yet been done but finding all solutions on a database of a million triples can be done on a laptop in less than 10 seconds. Query time scaling seems to be roughly linear with the database size.
Matcha exports some clj-kondo configuration which prevents clj-kondo warning about unbound variables when using the matcha query macros.
You can import these configs into your project with the following command:
$ clj-kondo --copy-configs --dependencies --lint "$(clojure -Spath)"
Imported config to .clj-kondo/grafter/matcha.alpha. To activate, add "grafter/matcha.alpha" to :config-paths in .clj-kondo/config.edn.
Then simply add the following to .clj-kondo/config.edn
:
{:config-paths ["grafter/matcha.alpha"]}
Matcha uses tools.build
and
tools.deps
for builds,
development and testing.
The command:
$ clojure -T:build test
Will run the tests, whilst
$ clojure -T:build build
$ clojure -T:build install
can be used to build and install a jar into your local mvn repository.
However for consuming local Matcha changes in local projects you are
usually better using tools.deps
:classpath-overrides
, or creating
a branch and consuming via a :git/url
.
For deployments CircleCI is setup
to automatically deploy tags of the form vX.Y.Z
where X.Y.Z
are
major.minor.patch
numbers. If you have permissions (i.e. you are
a Swirrl developer) the recommended workflow is to create a new
release of the main
branch in github with a tag that bumps the
version number appropriately.
NOTE: For this step to work you will need appropriate deployment privileges on clojars.org.
Copyright © Swirrl IT Ltd 2018
Distributed under the Eclipse Public License either version 1.0 or (at your option) any later version.