-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vectors: cross-species resource competition #41
Comments
I've been considering how to model this. Equation 2a,b gives the emergence from the current model. It seems to me that the Likely more pertinent is that with the simple model there will be no forcing of the proportion of emerging mosquitoes belonging to each species, thus it would not surprise me if one species frequently ends up eliminating all other competing species in simulations even where all are equally efficient at reproduction. Perhaps this could be prevented by imposing an efficiency penalty on resources used from "other" species? (During initialisation, the resources required by each species is calculated.) |
As with the parasite genotypes, the different species will need to We should have at least one parameter of the larval life cycle that On 20.06.2015 21:32, Diggory Hardy wrote:
Thomas Smith |
Let μ(t) be emergence at time t:
Model adaptation: let y(t) refer to juveniles from the current species, and y̅(t) ["y bar"] refer to juveniles from all competing species. Let us also replace γ with γ̅ ["gamma bar"] since it refers to resources available to all species. We now use the following, where μ, ρ and y are properties of a single species:
Reversing the new equation for emergence, we obtain γ̅:
This implies that (ρ y - μ) / μ should be equal for each species. Due especially to how μ is estimated in the model, this is extremely unlikely. I propose therefore to set γ̅ as:
(which follows intuition, since emergence is maximised by a large 1/γ). |
... I suspect the mentioned "bug" caused no real issue, except that changes in 1bb9092 were incompatible with the pre-"fix" code. Reasoning: initialisation was still happening for all species, albeit over more cycles. |
After discussion with Tom and Nakul, it appears that this model would be tricky to parameterise in such a way that species coexist, and doing so within OpenMalaria would have limited benefits. We propose not to do this but will leave the issue open to future comments (@obriet). |
If we work further on this, I would suggest it should be as a stand-alone ento model, not as part of OpenMalaria |
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
diggory....@gmail.com
on 27 Nov 2013 at 12:12The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: