Issue #41 #43
Merged
Issue #41 #43
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Added an example IntegrationTest - Polished Javadoc Issue #41
|
Ah, thank you so much 😃 |
|
Looking good, thanks again 😃 |
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2017
… for that()...simpleName...() and added NamingConventionIntegrationTest to assert the behavior of those examples for the future. Issue: #41
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2021
… for that()...simpleName...() and added NamingConventionIntegrationTest to assert the behavior of those examples for the future. Issue: #41
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
this PR implements everything that should be required in order to resolve #41.
Please review the changes. I was unsure whether to call the negation methods
haveXyzNotornotHaveas you suggested, since I had already started naming the methodshaveSimpleNamingNotEndingWithand it was merged like that. I have no problems with renaming all methods respectively if wanted.Stef
I hereby agree to the terms of the ArchUnit Contributor License Agreement.