Extend rules api with dependency conditions #99
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2019
…terface types instead of resolving runtime types via TypeToken (necessary to support more extended generics for complex members syntax with inheritance; we need to pass information about actual type parameters of generic interface types on, instead of using TypeToken on runtime types which will in parts yield <? extends #99...> types instead of the correctly bounded declared type available via public API) Issue: #38 Signed-off-by: Peter Gafert <peter.gafert@tngtech.com>
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2019
…terface types instead of resolving runtime types via TypeToken (necessary to support more extended generics for complex members syntax with inheritance; we need to pass information about actual type parameters of generic interface types on, instead of using TypeToken on runtime types which will in parts yield <? extends #99...> types instead of the correctly bounded declared type available via public API) Issue: #38 Signed-off-by: Peter Gafert <peter.gafert@tngtech.com>
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2019
…terface types instead of resolving runtime types via TypeToken (necessary to support more extended generics for complex members syntax with inheritance; we need to pass information about actual type parameters of generic interface types on, instead of using TypeToken on runtime types which will in parts yield <? extends #99...> types instead of the correctly bounded declared type available via public API) Issue: #38 Signed-off-by: Peter Gafert <peter.gafert@tngtech.com>
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2019
…terface types instead of resolving runtime types via TypeToken (necessary to support more extended generics for complex members syntax with inheritance; we need to pass information about actual type parameters of generic interface types on, instead of using TypeToken on runtime types which will in parts yield <? extends #99...> types instead of the correctly bounded declared type available via public API) Issue: #38 Signed-off-by: Peter Gafert <peter.gafert@tngtech.com>
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2019
…terface types instead of resolving runtime types via TypeToken (necessary to support more extended generics for complex members syntax with inheritance; we need to pass information about actual type parameters of generic interface types on, instead of using TypeToken on runtime types which will in parts yield <? extends #99...> types instead of the correctly bounded declared type available via public API) Issue: #38 Signed-off-by: Peter Gafert <peter.gafert@tngtech.com>
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2021
…itions Extend rules api with dependency conditions
codecholeric
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2021
…terface types instead of resolving runtime types via TypeToken (necessary to support more extended generics for complex members syntax with inheritance; we need to pass information about actual type parameters of generic interface types on, instead of using TypeToken on runtime types which will in parts yield <? extends #99...> types instead of the correctly bounded declared type available via public API) Issue: #38 Signed-off-by: Peter Gafert <peter.gafert@tngtech.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
dependOnClassesThat(predicate?)andonlyHaveDependentClassesThat(predicate?)to the rules API.Resolves: #69