Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 10, 2023. It is now read-only.

Dynamic lights stutter a lot vs Magnesium/Rubidium Dynamic Lights #3

Open
Radk6 opened this issue Oct 30, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

Dynamic lights stutter a lot vs Magnesium/Rubidium Dynamic Lights #3

Radk6 opened this issue Oct 30, 2022 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Radk6
Copy link

Radk6 commented Oct 30, 2022

Rubidium Toolkit:

2022-10-30.11-33-14.mp4

Magnesium/Rubidium Dynamic Lights + Magnesium/Rubidium Extras:

2022-10-30.11-34-25.mp4

(Sorry for the poor video quality, I had to compress them to 10MB)

Other mods used:

mods

Both instances were run with the same JVM arguments and the same Java version.

@TexBlock
Copy link
Member

Rubidium Toolkit version?

@Radk6
Copy link
Author

Radk6 commented Oct 30, 2022

Latest (1.0.3)

@TexBlock
Copy link
Member

TexBlock commented Oct 30, 2022

I think some feature of Magnesium/Rubidium Extras is optimized for dynamic light sources, or should I roll back some features that I removed?

@TexBlock TexBlock self-assigned this Oct 30, 2022
@TexBlock TexBlock added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Oct 30, 2022
@TexBlock TexBlock mentioned this issue Oct 31, 2022
4 tasks
@TexBlock TexBlock added bug Something isn't working and removed help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Feb 1, 2023
@TexBlock
Copy link
Member

TexBlock commented Feb 1, 2023

Fix in mc1.16.5-v1.0.4

@TexBlock TexBlock closed this as completed Feb 1, 2023
@Redls07
Copy link

Redls07 commented Feb 1, 2023

Not fixed

1.mp4

@Radk6
Copy link
Author

Radk6 commented Feb 2, 2023

Yup, same here, the issue is still present. Magnesium/Rubidium DL works fine, Rubidium Toolkit stutters/lags a lot.

@TexBlock TexBlock reopened this Feb 3, 2023
@Kasualix
Copy link
Member

Kasualix commented Feb 6, 2023

😨

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants