fix: date schema for telegram summary date index! #324
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request primarily involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
dags/hivemind_telegram_etl.py (1)
108-108: Consider data migration needs for existing records.The schema change from TEXT to DATETIME might affect existing records in the vector store.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Verify if existing summary records need migration from TEXT to DATETIME format
- Plan a migration strategy if needed:
- Create a one-time migration script
- Consider adding version tracking to handle schema changes
- Add error handling for potential format mismatches during the transition
Would you like assistance in creating a migration plan or script?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
dags/hivemind_telegram_etl.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
dags/hivemind_telegram_etl.py (1)
108-108: Appropriate schema change for date handling.
Changing to PayloadSchemaType.DATETIME is the correct approach for the date field, as it enables proper date-based operations and comparisons.
Let's verify the date handling in related components:
Consider adding a comment documenting the expected date format to ensure consistent handling across the pipeline.
Add a comment above the date_schema assignment:
+ # Date field must be in ISO format for proper DATETIME handling
date_schema = models.PayloadSchemaType.DATETIME✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate the final response based on the date handling patterns found in the codebase:
Schema change is compatible with existing date handling
The codebase consistently handles dates in ISO format:
- Telegram summaries use
strftime("%Y-%m-%d")format for dates intransform/summary.py - Date parsing utilities support ISO format through
datetime.fromisoformat() - The schema change aligns with the existing date handling patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check date handling in transformer and related files
# Check how dates are formatted in the TransformSummary class
rg -A 5 "class TransformSummary"
# Check for date format patterns in the codebase
rg -g '!*.{json,md,txt}' -A 3 'strftime|strptime|datetime.fromisoformat|parse_date'
Length of output: 46426
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes