Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat ✨ Split transient field serialization into request and response flags #904

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2024
Merged

Feat ✨ Split transient field serialization into request and response flags #904

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2024

Conversation

linwumingshi
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Introduced serializeRequestTransients and serializeResponseTransients with default false
  • Removed skipTransientField as it is no longer needed
  • Updated comments to describe the new flags and their default behavior
  • Adjusted interface documentation to allow user configuration for transient field serialization

See #899

…and response flags

- Introduced `serializeRequestTransients` and `serializeResponseTransients` with default `false`
- Removed `skipTransientField` as it is no longer needed
- Updated comments to describe the new flags and their default behavior
- Adjusted interface documentation to allow user configuration for transient field serialization
@shalousun shalousun merged commit bdc4619 into TongchengOpenSource:master Aug 31, 2024
11 checks passed
@linwumingshi linwumingshi deleted the feature/transients-field branch August 31, 2024 14:16
@shalousun shalousun added this to the 3.0.8 milestone Sep 2, 2024
@shalousun shalousun added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants