Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tumblr Search does not seem to be working #190

Closed
thomas694 opened this issue Nov 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Tumblr Search does not seem to be working #190

thomas694 opened this issue Nov 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@thomas694
Copy link
Contributor

The following has been submitted:

Tumblr Search does not seem to be working.
Seeing this error in the logs:
20211123 06:55:24.081 Err TumblrSearchCrawler.CrawlPageAsync: Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException: 'System.Dynamic.ExpandoObject' does not contain a definition for 'timelines'
at CallSite.Target(Closure , CallSite , Object )
at System.Dynamic.UpdateDelegates.UpdateAndExecute1[T0,TRet](CallSite site, T0 arg0)
at CallSite.Target(Closure , CallSite , Object )
at TumblThree.Applications.Crawler.TumblrSearchCrawler.d__10.MoveNext() in C:\projects\Tumblthree\src\TumblThree\TumblThree.Applications\Crawler\TumblrSearchCrawler.cs:line 119
@thomas694
Copy link
Contributor Author

It doesn't affect safe keywords.
For the other keywords you need to be signed in to be able to search them and download the posts.

thomas694 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 28, 2021
@thomas694
Fix issue #190 Tumblr Search not working while logged out
e143c0a 
- The Tumblr Search had been refactored to use dynamic objects instead of classes for the json structure. Obviously Tumblr uses two different paths whether being logged in or not while searching.
- Now it works again for both.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@thomas694