Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check that the correct AD backend is being used #2291
Check that the correct AD backend is being used #2291
Changes from 3 commits
b9da0a6
17eb8a9
c0cab10
44dd017
15701c2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah there's no way you can do this here unfortunately 😕
Possibly crazy idea, but it might make sense to specifically overload the adjoint computation for a given backend which doesn't use types, e.g.
? Could do the same with Enzyme.jl and Tapir.jl, both of which would suffer from the same issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this, and implemented it. Turns out there's
Zygote.hook
for exactly these sorts of things.I thought a bit about switching to doing all checks like this, and giving up on the element type approach, but that seemed like it would get more complicated than is worth at this point. We now catch all cases except if one uses ForwardDiff when Zygote is expected, which seems sufficient to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very, very nice @mhauru :)