Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: increase max Dart SDK #66

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

chore: increase max Dart SDK #66

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

alestiago
Copy link
Contributor

Status

READY

Description

Increase the max supported SDK.

Type of Change

  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🧹 Code refactor
  • ✅ Build configuration change
  • 📝 Documentation
  • 🗑️ Chore

@alestiago alestiago added the chore Changes that don't modify source code or tests label Aug 16, 2024
@alestiago alestiago self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@alestiago alestiago requested a review from a team as a code owner August 16, 2024 14:06
@alestiago alestiago marked this pull request as draft August 16, 2024 14:07
@tomarra tomarra added the p1 High-priority issues at the top of the work list label Aug 27, 2024
@tomarra tomarra marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2024 15:36
@tomarra tomarra merged commit 8896ae7 into main Oct 22, 2024
7 checks passed
@tomarra tomarra deleted the altestiago/increase-max-Dart-SDK branch October 22, 2024 16:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@tomarra tomarra tomarra approved these changes

Assignees

@alestiago alestiago

Labels
chore Changes that don't modify source code or tests p1 High-priority issues at the top of the work list
Projects
VGV Open Source 🦄 🧙🌟
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@alestiago @tomarra