Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CMIP6 license per source #1066

Merged
merged 151 commits into from
May 24, 2022

Conversation

durack1
Copy link
Member

@durack1 durack1 commented May 17, 2022

Fix #1050

Will need to confirm whether the data found for CMCC-ESM2-SR5 will need to be deleted, as it is not currently available through ESGF #296 - and we have notes that this was an errored publication #900

Ref #1028

durack1 and others added 30 commits February 8, 2022 11:35
…b.com:WCRP-CMIP/CMIP6_CVs into issue1050_durack1_AddCMIP6LicensePerSource_id

updating with remote (#1050)
@taylor13
Copy link
Collaborator

I like what you've done in the license.json file. I'd favor making an additional tweak to the source_id file. In order to avoid "rights" in line19 above, could we use the word "license" here and then change "license" in line 15 to "license_info"?

(might also consider replacing in license.json, "license_id" with "license_title" so no chance of confusing with "id" in source_id; judgement call ... I don't really care too much. If you make this change, then you'll have to also exchange the word in the first line of the file.)

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented May 18, 2022

@taylor13 those changes are now in place, and the new CMIP6_source_id.json:

"label_extended":"Line-By-Line Radiative Transfer Model v1.5, Laboratoire Meteorologie Dynamique, GEISA spectroscopic database",
"license_info":{
"exceptions_contact":"@listes.ipsl.fr <- ipsl-cmip6",
"history":"2020-06-11: initially published under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0",
"id":"CC BY-NC-SA 4.0",
"license":"Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)",
"source_specific_info":"",
"url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/"
},
"model_component":{

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented May 18, 2022

@matthew-mizielinski to provide a little more guidance (and constrain the review task), it would be great if you can review all the HadGEM* and UKESM* entries, if these all check out, then we're good with a merge (the GISS* contributions I have correct, I think), e.g.

HadGEM3-GC31-HH

CMIP6_CVs/CMIP6_source_id.json

Lines 4737 to 4759 in bbd4e7d

"HadGEM3-GC31-HH":{
"activity_participation":[
"CMIP",
"HighResMIP"
],
"cohort":[
"Published"
],
"institution_id":[
"MOHC",
"NERC"
],
"label":"HadGEM3-GC31-HH",
"label_extended":"HadGEM3-GC3.1-N512ORCA12",
"license_info":{
"exceptions_contact":"@metoffice.gov.uk <- enquiries",
"history":"2018-09-27: initially published under CC BY-SA 4.0",
"id":"CC BY-SA 4.0",
"license":"Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)",
"source_specific_info":"",
"url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"
},
"model_component":{

UKESM1-0-LL

CMIP6_CVs/CMIP6_source_id.json

Lines 8250 to 8285 in bbd4e7d

"UKESM1-0-LL":{
"activity_participation":[
"AerChemMIP",
"C4MIP",
"CDRMIP",
"CMIP",
"DAMIP",
"GeoMIP",
"LS3MIP",
"LUMIP",
"OMIP",
"PMIP",
"RFMIP",
"ScenarioMIP",
"VolMIP"
],
"cohort":[
"Published"
],
"institution_id":[
"MOHC",
"NERC",
"NIMS-KMA",
"NIWA"
],
"label":"UKESM1.0-LL",
"label_extended":"UKESM1.0-N96ORCA1",
"license_info":{
"exceptions_contact":"@metoffice.gov.uk <- cmip6.ukesm1",
"history":"2019-04-04: initially published under CC BY-SA 4.0; 2021-11-15: relaxed to CC BY 4.0",
"id":"CC BY 4.0",
"license":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)",
"source_specific_info":"https://ukesm.ac.uk/licensing-of-met-office-nerc-and-niwa-cmip6-data/",
"url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
},
"model_component":{

I believe I have added a license_info entry for all models that have published data (that would also be great to check - crossref #1050 (comment); with UKESM1-0-MMh and UKESM1-1-LL the only two MOHC contributions)

** Edit: it seems that the info at https://ukesm.ac.uk/licensing-of-met-office-nerc-and-niwa-cmip6-data/ provides info for ALL MOHC data, which includes all the HadGEM* offerings too, so they will need to also be amended, I presume with the same date/info as the UKESM* offerings?

Copy link
Collaborator

@taylor13 taylor13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thanks!

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented May 19, 2022

@matthew-mizielinski those HadGEM3* changes are now in place, so we have for e.g.

HadGEM3-GC31-HH

CMIP6_CVs/CMIP6_source_id.json

Lines 4737 to 4759 in 1876f6d

"HadGEM3-GC31-HH":{
"activity_participation":[
"CMIP",
"HighResMIP"
],
"cohort":[
"Published"
],
"institution_id":[
"MOHC",
"NERC"
],
"label":"HadGEM3-GC31-HH",
"label_extended":"HadGEM3-GC3.1-N512ORCA12",
"license_info":{
"exceptions_contact":"@metoffice.gov.uk <- cmip6.hadgem3",
"history":"2018-09-27: initially published under CC BY-SA 4.0; 2021-11-15: relaxed to CC BY 4.0",
"id":"CC BY 4.0",
"license":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)",
"source_specific_info":"https://ukesm.ac.uk/licensing-of-met-office-nerc-and-niwa-cmip6-data/",
"url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
},
"model_component":{

UKESM1-0-LL

CMIP6_CVs/CMIP6_source_id.json

Lines 8250 to 8285 in 1876f6d

"UKESM1-0-LL":{
"activity_participation":[
"AerChemMIP",
"C4MIP",
"CDRMIP",
"CMIP",
"DAMIP",
"GeoMIP",
"LS3MIP",
"LUMIP",
"OMIP",
"PMIP",
"RFMIP",
"ScenarioMIP",
"VolMIP"
],
"cohort":[
"Published"
],
"institution_id":[
"MOHC",
"NERC",
"NIMS-KMA",
"NIWA"
],
"label":"UKESM1.0-LL",
"label_extended":"UKESM1.0-N96ORCA1",
"license_info":{
"exceptions_contact":"@metoffice.gov.uk <- cmip6.ukesm1",
"history":"2019-04-04: initially published under CC BY-SA 4.0; 2021-11-15: relaxed to CC BY 4.0",
"id":"CC BY 4.0",
"license":"Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)",
"source_specific_info":"https://ukesm.ac.uk/licensing-of-met-office-nerc-and-niwa-cmip6-data/",
"url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
},
"model_component":{

Copy link
Collaborator

@matthew-mizielinski matthew-mizielinski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is ready to go -- I've got one comment, but that is probably more for the creation of the CV file in with the MIP tables

CMIP6_license.json Show resolved Hide resolved
@matthew-mizielinski
Copy link
Collaborator

Have added pull request #1069 as a possible merge into this pull request (before merging to master) -- this has a prototype license table.

@durack1 durack1 merged commit bb36f0d into master May 24, 2022
@durack1 durack1 deleted the issue1050_durack1_AddCMIP6LicensePerSource_id branch May 24, 2022 18:36
@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented May 24, 2022

@mauzey1 we have made changes in particular to the CMIP6_license.json (added a license_options field) and CMIP6_source_id.json (added a license_info field for most models). Just an FYI as this may require some updates downstream in https://github.com/PCMDI/cmip6-cmor-tables/ and https://github.com/PCMDI/cmor

@mauzey1
Copy link

mauzey1 commented May 24, 2022

@durack1 Thanks for the heads up. I will checkout out how the new license options work with cmip6-cmor-tables and CMOR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add CMIP6 license/rights information per source_id
5 participants