Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove __wasi_proc_raise() #7

Closed
sunfishcode opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

remove __wasi_proc_raise() #7

sunfishcode opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
proposal A discussion about a specific actionable item

Comments

@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

From bytecodealliance/wasmtime#68:

__wasi_proc_raise in its current form is effectively just a variant of __wasi_proc_exit which produces an exit status indicating that the process was killed with a signal rather than exiting normally.

I agree that this is obscure, and it could create complications if real signal handling is added later, so we should consider removing it.

@sunfishcode
Copy link
Member Author

proc_raise was removed in #136!

yamt added a commit to yamt/wasm-micro-runtime that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2022
…lable

Many of these signal constants are not available on NuttX.

Maybe we can remove these signal stuff sooner or later.
    WebAssembly/WASI#7
    WebAssembly/wasi-libc#278
wenyongh pushed a commit to bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2022
…lable (#1125)

Many of these signal constants are not available on NuttX.

Maybe we can remove these signal stuff sooner or later:
    WebAssembly/WASI#7
    WebAssembly/wasi-libc#278
victoryang00 pushed a commit to victoryang00/wamr-aot-gc-checkpoint-restore that referenced this issue May 27, 2024
…lable (bytecodealliance#1125)

Many of these signal constants are not available on NuttX.

Maybe we can remove these signal stuff sooner or later:
    WebAssembly/WASI#7
    WebAssembly/wasi-libc#278
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
proposal A discussion about a specific actionable item
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants