-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 451
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Filename extension for S-expression test files #94
Comments
Good point, this has been bugging me too for a while. .wase sounds ok to me, although I would have gone with .wast (Wasm AST or WASm Test). |
I like .wast.
|
'.wast' works for me. I submitted #100 to implement it. |
#100 is merged. Thanks! |
dhil
pushed a commit
to dhil/webassembly-spec
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2023
To sync our spec with the reference type repo, we need this submodule too.
dhil
pushed a commit
to dhil/webassembly-spec
that referenced
this issue
Mar 2, 2023
…ebAssembly#116) This reverts commit 1d553de. This reverts WebAssembly#94 in an attempt to revert all squashed commits before we correctly merge upstream commits as the guideline suggests.
rossberg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2024
dhil
pushed a commit
to dhil/webassembly-spec
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2024
rossberg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The test files in ml-proto/test were originally name with a '.wasm' extension. However, we might expect .wasm to eventually be the filename extension for the official binary format. I propose we use '.wase' for the S-expression text format.
I accidentally committed a patch implementing this to master in be2b6ea which renames the files to '.wase', rather than submitting a pull request. I'm happy to revert it, or I'm happy to submit a new patch using some other extension, following whatever consensus we get here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: