Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable to restore from sliding_window() #441

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 20, 2024

Conversation

WenjieDu
Copy link
Owner

What does this PR do?

  1. fixing A minor bug in sliding_window() #440;
  2. fixing Add a func inverse_sliding_window #439;

Before submitting

  • This PR is made to fix a typo or improve the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if this is the case).
  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? Please add a link to it if that's the case.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have written necessary tests and already run them locally.

@WenjieDu WenjieDu merged commit c7ecd0b into dev Jun 20, 2024
6 of 8 checks passed
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Jun 20, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9591932274

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 5 of 25 (20.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.3%) to 83.348%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
pypots/data/utils.py 3 23 13.04%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
pypots/nn/modules/fedformer/layers.py 2 45.99%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9584986596: 0.3%
Covered Lines: 10096
Relevant Lines: 12113

💛 - Coveralls

@WenjieDu WenjieDu deleted the (feat)restore_from_sliding_window branch June 21, 2024 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants