-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve the block mover buttons accessibility #557
Comments
Ideally, the button should use some text to say what it does but it should also somehow reference the block it relates to. I.e. "Move Up" and "Move Down" wouldn't help so much users if they don't know what they're going to move. The component should grab some information about the currently edited block, I see the state has some references to the |
Hi all - First time here so let me know if I'm doing anything wrong, but would like to attempt to take this issue on. Will be able to work on it from Sunday onwards. Agreed that it's not exactly black and white as to how the block could be identified. Initial thoughts are to give the buttons labels which inherit from some portion of either the content or the type of content being moved. Button contrast should be an easy enough thing to sort, assuming they're standard SVGs. Let me know if there's anything I need to do to get started on this before Sunday but happy to take it on as a first task! |
@njpanderson Would be great to have you take a look at this. Since the We do have a label for a block available by its |
Related: #552 and #873. I think this will be better when the buttons and toolbars are clearly linked to a given block. So there is the main tabbing flow of blocks, and you can list the relevant actions (movers, formatting, switcher) when pressing the shortcut. The user would know which block the button is for (the one they just pressed the shortcut for), and they press esc (or maybe action) to move the focus back. This flow is similar to the current core editor. |
Tbh, I think it's best to address this issue with the other block focus issues. |
Ok, so should I look into this discretely or would you guys rather roll this issue into a wider task? I am happy to take on something else if needed! |
@njpanderson I'm not sure what specific tasks @iseulde had in mind, but I've made a pass through all of the issues to try to apply "Good First Task" to a number more, if you'd like to consider another option: |
Sorry, I didn't mean to put you off. :) Rephrasing: I think it's best to address the question of what label we put on it with generally improving the flow for buttons that are attached to block. See #552. |
No problem, @iseulde - definitely not putting me off. Have been out of communications for the past two days whilst wandering around Arran. Will be likely having a look at the other issues @aduth posted tonight though, and see if there's something else a bit more standalone I can help with. I've made a tiny change to the contrast of the buttons already and if you like I can PR that. Not sure it would be worth it though! |
Have checked the new contrast meets WCAG AA using the following tool: http://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ If there’s a better checker you guys all use, do let me know in the comments!
Ok, I've added something that leverages the label attribute of Not sure how to let you all see this but it's currently sitting in a branch on my fork: Would like to add test case for that new |
Have checked the new contrast meets WCAG AA using the following tool: http://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ If there’s a better checker you guys all use, do let me know in the comments!
That's test cases added for the function. |
Have checked the new contrast meets WCAG AA using the following tool: http://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/ If there’s a better checker you guys all use, do let me know in the comments!
After thinking about what would be best for the user in terms of accessibility and guidance, I’ve decided that trying to give them the “content” of a block wouldn’t very useful in a lot of contexts – especially non-text blocks. Instead, I’ve opted for telling them where the block is, and where it’ll be moved to. This is also the case for multiple selected blocks, where it will fall back to simpler language.
Increase colour contrast on block mover buttons (#557)
Add contextually aware title for block mover control (#557)
@afercia @njpanderson it looks like #981 and #984 are related. Is this issue now resolved, or is there still more to do here? |
@nylen quickly tested with Safari+VoiceOver seems the positions are announced correctly and the color contrast is OK. Only doubt if the disabled up/down arrows when in first/last position should be really disabled but I'd lean towards keeping them as now so they're still focusable. In rare circumstances is acceptable to keep "disabled" controls focusable and seems to work better this way. |
Thanks all. Daughter has been in hospital so it's been hard to keep up to date but great to see this issue now closed. On to the next thing! |
Oh my goodness! All the best thoughts to you and yours. |
The block mover buttons are empty, there's no text or aria-label at all, thus there's nothing that can be announced by assistive technologies.
For screen readers, they could use hidden text or an aria-label. I'd recommend to test them also with speech recognition software, really not sure how they can be activated if they have no visible text at all.
Additionally, the color contrast is really low. As a reminder, the WCAG level AA WordPress aims for requires a color contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1.
About the SVG icons, see the specific issue #528
Of course, these buttons should be fully operable when using only a keyboard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: