-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update JSDoc #13742
Update JSDoc #13742
Conversation
Is this part of a systematic check of all documentation for RichText? |
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import { normaliseFormats } from './normalise-formats'; | |||
* Combine all Rich Text values into one. This is similar to | |||
* `String.prototype.concat`. | |||
* | |||
* @param {...[object]} values An array of all values to combine. | |||
* @param {...Object} values Objects to combine. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought I'd seen the removed syntax around... The one you're suggesting seems correct but it's a bit weird to me. values
is an array, not an object?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm working on generating documentation (markdown, html) from the JSDoc comments and this one didn't pass my tests. I didn't find this way of param type declaration in the standard.
I thought it took objects as input? As in concat( object1, object2, object3 );
. That is what is implied in the tests. concat
converts that input into an array, though:
export function concat( ...values ) { }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes as proposed seem correct to me. If it receives variadic arguments, it should be a ...
prefix on the type expected.
From your link, see under "Variable number of that type". The main difference is ES2015+ adds syntax support for the spread argument.
Related:
Update JSDoc comment for
concat
function.