Jest Preset: Major version upgrade for Jest in all packages #20766
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gziolo
added
[Type] Automated Testing
|
I still see some failing tests that need to be further investigated. It looks like all of them are related to DOM structure or interactions I would appreciate help from @diegohaz, @getdave or @nerrad. Would it help to land one of the PRs with Summary of all failing tests
FAIL packages/components/src/sandbox/test/index.js
● should rerender with new emdeded content if html prop changes
expect(jest.fn()).not.toHaveErrored(expected)
Expected mock function not to be called but it was called with:
["Error: Uncaught [TypeError: Cannot read property 'body' of undefined]
at reportException (/Users/gziolo/Projects/gutenberg/node_modules/jsdom/lib/jsdom/living/helpers/runtime-script-errors.js:62:24)
at notifyMutationObservers (/Users/gziolo/Projects/gutenberg/node_modules/jsdom/lib/jsdom/living/helpers/mutation-observers.js:166:
11)
at /Users/gziolo/Projects/gutenberg/node_modules/jsdom/lib/jsdom/living/helpers/mutation-observers.js:133:5
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)", [TypeError: Cannot read property 'body' of undefined]]
34 | function assertExpectedCalls() {
35 | if ( spy.assertionsNumber === 0 && spy.mock.calls.length > 0 ) {
> 36 | expect( console ).not[ matcherName ]();
| ^
37 | }
38 | }
39 |
at Object.assertExpectedCalls (packages/jest-console/src/index.js:36:4)
FAIL packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/tabbable.js
● TabbableContainer › should navigate by keypresses
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: 0
88 | ) {
89 | const interaction = fireKeyDown( container, keyCode, shiftKey );
> 90 | expect( currentIndex ).toBe( expectedActiveIndex );
| ^
91 | expect( interaction.stopped ).toBe( expectedStop );
92 | }
93 |
at assertKeyDown (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/tabbable.js:90:27)
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/tabbable.js:94:3)
● TabbableContainer › should navigate by keypresses and stop at edges
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: 0
145 | ) {
146 | const interaction = fireKeyDown( container, keyCode, shiftKey );
> 147 | expect( currentIndex ).toBe( expectedActiveIndex );
| ^
148 | expect( interaction.stopped ).toBe( expectedStop );
149 | }
150 |
at assertKeyDown (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/tabbable.js:147:27)
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/tabbable.js:151:3)
FAIL packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js
● NavigableMenu › vertical: should navigate by up and down
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: 0
83 | function assertKeyDown( keyCode, expectedActiveIndex, expectedStop ) {
84 | const interaction = fireKeyDown( container, keyCode, false );
> 85 | expect( currentIndex ).toBe( expectedActiveIndex );
| ^
86 | expect( interaction.stopped ).toBe( expectedStop );
87 | }
88 |
at assertKeyDown (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:85:27)
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:89:3)
● NavigableMenu › vertical: should navigate by up and down, and stop at edges
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: 0
137 | function assertKeyDown( keyCode, expectedActiveIndex, expectedStop ) {
138 | const interaction = fireKeyDown( container, keyCode, false );
> 139 | expect( currentIndex ).toBe( expectedActiveIndex );
| ^
140 | expect( interaction.stopped ).toBe( expectedStop );
141 | }
142 |
at assertKeyDown (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:139:27)
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:143:3)
● NavigableMenu › horizontal: should navigate by left and right
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: 0
193 | function assertKeyDown( keyCode, expectedActiveIndex, expectedStop ) {
194 | const interaction = fireKeyDown( container, keyCode, false );
> 195 | expect( currentIndex ).toBe( expectedActiveIndex );
| ^
196 | expect( interaction.stopped ).toBe( expectedStop );
197 | }
198 |
at assertKeyDown (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:195:27)
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:199:3)
● NavigableMenu › horizontal: should navigate by left and right, and stop at edges
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: 0
247 | function assertKeyDown( keyCode, expectedActiveIndex, expectedStop ) {
248 | const interaction = fireKeyDown( container, keyCode, false );
> 249 | expect( currentIndex ).toBe( expectedActiveIndex );
| ^
250 | expect( interaction.stopped ).toBe( expectedStop );
251 | }
252 |
at assertKeyDown (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:249:27)
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:253:3)
● NavigableMenu › both: should navigate by up/down and left/right
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: 0
292 | function assertKeyDown( keyCode, expectedActiveIndex, expectedStop ) {
293 | const interaction = fireKeyDown( container, keyCode );
> 294 | expect( currentIndex ).toBe( expectedActiveIndex );
| ^
295 | expect( interaction.stopped ).toBe( expectedStop );
296 | }
297 |
at assertKeyDown (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:294:27)
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/navigable-container/test/menu.js:298:3)
FAIL packages/components/src/higher-order/with-focus-return/test/index.js
● withFocusReturn() › testing rendering and focus handling › should not switch focus back to the bound focus element
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: <button />
Received: null
77 | const mountedComposite = renderer.create( <Composite /> );
78 |
> 79 | expect( getInstance( mountedComposite ).activeElementOnMount ).toBe(
| ^
80 | activeElement
81 | );
82 |
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/higher-order/with-focus-return/test/index.js:79:67)
● withFocusReturn() › testing rendering and focus handling › should switch focus back when unmounted while having focus
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: <button />
Received: null
99 | // Should return to the activeElement saved with this component.
100 | wrapper.unmount();
> 101 | expect( document.activeElement ).toBe( activeElement );
| ^
102 | } );
103 |
104 | it( 'should switch focus to the most recent still-available focus target', () => {
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/higher-order/with-focus-return/test/index.js:101:37)
● withFocusReturn() › testing rendering and focus handling › should switch focus to the most recent still-available focus target
expect(jest.fn()).toHaveBeenCalled()
Expected number of calls: >= 1
Received number of calls: 0
140 | expect(
141 | wrapper.find( 'input[name="first"]' ).getDOMNode().focus
> 142 | ).toHaveBeenCalled();
| ^
143 | } );
144 | } );
145 | } );
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/higher-order/with-focus-return/test/index.js:142:6)
FAIL packages/components/src/popover/test/index.js
● Popover › should focus when opening in response to keyboard event
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: <div class="components-popover__content" tabindex="-1" />
Received: null
48 | 'components-popover__content'
49 | );
> 50 | expect( document.activeElement ).toBe( content );
| ^
51 | } );
52 | } );
53 |
at packages/components/src/popover/test/index.js:50:37
at batchedUpdates$1 (node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom.development.js:21643:12)
at act (node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-test-utils.development.js:1002:14)
at Object.act (node_modules/react-dom/cjs/react-dom-test-utils.development.js:1418:12)
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/popover/test/index.js:41:13)
FAIL packages/components/src/toolbar/test/index.js
● Toolbar › ToolbarGroup › should render an empty node, when controls are not passed
expect(received).toBeNull()
Received: ""
29 | it( 'should render an empty node, when controls are not passed', () => {
30 | const wrapper = mount( <Toolbar /> );
> 31 | expect( wrapper.html() ).toBeNull();
| ^
32 | } );
33 |
34 | it( 'should render an empty node, when controls are empty', () => {
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/toolbar/test/index.js:31:29)
● Toolbar › ToolbarGroup › should render an empty node, when controls are empty
expect(received).toBeNull()
Received: ""
34 | it( 'should render an empty node, when controls are empty', () => {
35 | const wrapper = mount( <Toolbar controls={ [] } /> );
> 36 | expect( wrapper.html() ).toBeNull();
| ^
37 | } );
38 |
39 | it( 'should render a list of controls with buttons', () => {
at Object.<anonymous> (packages/components/src/toolbar/test/index.js:36:29)
Test Suites: 6 failed, 349 passed, 355 total
Tests: 14 failed, 3752 passed, 3766 total
Snapshots: 287 passed, 287 total
Time: 23.799s, estimated 100s |
|
Size Change: 0 B Total Size: 890 kB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
6 tasks
|
I would try to install |
You read my mind. I had the same thought this weekend after reading that Enzyme is going to be maintained by the community. I’d be in favor of landing your PR that introduces RTL and then we can refactor those tests as follow-up. It should unblock this PR. |
gziolo
force-pushed
the
update/jest-major-upgrade
branch
from
329f170 to
de8f51a
Compare
gziolo
changed the title
gziolo
force-pushed
the
update/jest-major-upgrade
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fe59e79 to
2b683cf
Compare
|
There is only one failure left: FAIL packages/components/src/sandbox/test/index.js
● should rerender with new emdeded content if html prop changes
expect(jest.fn()).not.toHaveErrored(expected)
Expected mock function not to be called but it was called with:
["Error: Uncaught [TypeError: Cannot read property 'body' of undefined]
at reportException (/Users/gziolo/Projects/gutenberg/node_modules/jsdom/lib/jsdom/living/helpers/runtime-script-errors.js:62:24)
at notifyMutationObservers (/Users/gziolo/Projects/gutenberg/node_modules/jsdom/lib/jsdom/living/helpers/mutation-observers.js:166:11)
at /Users/gziolo/Projects/gutenberg/node_modules/jsdom/lib/jsdom/living/helpers/mutation-observers.js:133:5
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)", [TypeError: Cannot read property 'body' of undefined]]
34 | function assertExpectedCalls() {
35 | if ( spy.assertionsNumber === 0 && spy.mock.calls.length > 0 ) {
> 36 | expect( console ).not[ matcherName ]();
| ^
37 | }
38 | }
39 |
at Object.assertExpectedCalls (packages/jest-console/src/index.js:36:4)
Test Suites: 1 failed, 374 passed, 375 total
Tests: 1 failed, 4141 passed, 4142 total
Snapshots: 286 passed, 286 total
Time: 34.226s |
gziolo
force-pushed
the
update/jest-major-upgrade
branch
from
2b683cf to
3a9ec79
Compare
gziolo
commented
Apr 8, 2020
gziolo
requested review from
ajitbohra,
chrisvanpatten,
epiqueras,
jorgefilipecosta,
noahtallen,
noisysocks,
ntwb,
talldan and
youknowriad
as code owners
aduth
reviewed
Apr 8, 2020
gziolo
force-pushed
the
update/jest-major-upgrade
branch
from
3a9ec79 to
c37eda9
Compare
|
I sorted out all the failing tests. This PR is ready to go on the technical level. Now the question is whether we like the tests refactored to use React Testing Library? I'm happy to extract refactorings to their own PR if that help to move forward 😄 |
aduth
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2020
gziolo
force-pushed
the
update/jest-major-upgrade
branch
from
f05ad58 to
2dc7830
Compare
This was referenced May 15, 2020
torounit
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2022
ciampo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2022
* refactor storybook * convert to typescript * fix ComponentProps * add changelog. * fix imports order * use WordPressComponentProps. * add example * Update packages/components/src/disabled/types.ts Co-authored-by: Marco Ciampini <marco.ciampo@gmail.com> * Update packages/components/src/disabled/index.tsx Co-authored-by: Marco Ciampini <marco.ciampo@gmail.com> * Update packages/components/src/disabled/index.tsx Co-authored-by: Petter Walbø Johnsgård <petter@dekode.no> * Update packages/components/src/disabled/index.tsx Co-authored-by: Petter Walbø Johnsgård <petter@dekode.no> * Remove unused imports. * Rewrite to Testing-library `will disable all fields` * Rewrite to Testing-library `should cleanly un-disable via reconciliation` * use rerender * refactor test. * replace react-dom/test-utils to testing-library. * remove unnecessary MutationObserver stab. @see #20766 #20514 * Convert to typescript. * add story for contentEditable * add control settings. * fix changelog * Update packages/components/CHANGELOG.md Co-authored-by: Marco Ciampini <marco.ciampo@gmail.com> * Omit ref. * avoid querying * rename div. * test before rerender * Simplify * Update packages/components/src/disabled/test/index.tsx Co-authored-by: Marco Ciampini <marco.ciampo@gmail.com> * test for sneaky DOM manipulation * Fix `isDisabled` so that it keeps its value even if it is changed. * add default args * Revert "Fix `isDisabled` so that it keeps its value even if it is changed." This reverts commit 28820f0. * Update packages/components/src/disabled/test/index.tsx * Update packages/components/CHANGELOG.md Co-authored-by: Marco Ciampini <marco.ciampo@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Petter Walbø Johnsgård <petter@dekode.no>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR updated Jest to the last version. It also upgrades all related dependencies like
enzymeorjsdom.It was triggered by the issue discovered by @brentswisher in #20514. Related comments:
TODO
How has this been tested?
Executed:
npm run test-unitnpm run test-e2eThere are still some unit tests failing ...
There is no observed impact on e2e tests.
Types of changes
Checklist: